对比深度学习与传统方法,发现小数据下简单模型更优
Load Forecasting for Households and Energy Communities: Are Deep Learning Models Worth the Effort?
- 用LSTM、Transformer等模型对比KNN和持续性预测
- 2个月数据时迁移学习降低误差1.97个百分点
- 50户社区中简单KNN也能省8.01%电费
能源社区在可再生能源占比高的去中心化能源系统中起关键作用,精准的短期负荷预测对实现需求侧管理至关重要。本研究评估了主流深度学习模型(LSTM、xLSTM、Transformer)与传统基准(KNN、持续性预测)在不同社区规模、历史数据量及模型复杂度下的表现。结果表明,在不足六个月训练数据时,简单持续性模型优于深度学习模型。使用公开合成负荷数据进行迁移学习,在仅两个月训练数据条件下,平均降低归一化绝对误差1.97个百分点。基于混合整数线性规划优化的共享储能系统显示:最准确的深度学习模型使50户社区平均节省8.06%能源成本,而简单KNN同样实现8.01%的平均节约,具备竞争力与鲁棒性。所有代码公开,便于复现。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Energy communities (ECs) play a key role in enabling local demand shifting and enhancing self-sufficiency, as energy systems transition toward decentralized structures with high shares of renewable generation. To optimally operate them, accurate short-term load forecasting is essential, particularly for implementing demand-side management strategies. With the recent rise of deep learning methods, data-driven forecasting has gained significant attention, however, it remains insufficiently explored in many practical contexts. Therefore, this study evaluates the effectiveness of state-of-the-art deep learning models-including LSTM, xLSTM, and Transformer architectures-compared to traditional benchmarks such as K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and persistence forecasting, across varying community size, historical data availability, and model complexity. Additionally, we assess the benefits of transfer learning using publicly available synthetic load profiles. On average, transfer learning improves the normalized mean absolute error by 1.97 percentage points when only two months of training data are available. Interestingly, for less than six months of training data, simple persistence models outperform deep learning architectures in forecast accuracy. The practical value of improved forecasting is demonstrated using a mixed-integer linear programming optimization for ECs with a shared battery energy storage system. For an energy community with 50 households, the most accurate deep learning model achieves an average reduction in financial energy costs of 8.06%. Notably, a simple KNN approach achieves average savings of 8.01%, making it a competitive and robust alternative. All implementations are publicly available to facilitate reproducibility. These findings offer actionable insights for ECs, and they highlight when the additional complexity of deep learning is warranted by performance gains.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。