构建视频问答新基准,专测模型对时间逻辑关系的理解能力
TimeLogic: A Temporal Logic Benchmark for Video QA
- 用逻辑算子自动生成测试时间顺序与因果关系的问答对
- 生成32k~160k个高质量问答对,覆盖16类时间逻辑场景
- 适合评估视觉语言模型在复杂时序推理上的真实水平
时间逻辑理解是人类认知的核心能力,对捕捉视频中复杂事件及其时间关系至关重要。当前视频问答(VideoQA)基准大多忽略这一关键能力,因标注时间逻辑存在困难。尽管视觉语言模型持续进步,其时间逻辑推理能力仍缺乏有效评估,主要受限于缺乏需形式化复杂时间推理的问答对。为此,我们提出TimeLogic QA(TLQA)框架,可自动构建此类问答对。该框架利用现有视频数据集中的时间标注,结合逻辑理论中的时间算子,生成测试事件序列与时间关系的问题。TLQA具有通用性与可扩展性,既可基于带时间动作分割的视频数据集,也可基于带时间场景图的视频数据集。我们使用STAR、Breakfast、AGQA和CrossTask共4个数据集,生成两个版本:小规模(TLQA-S)含2,000个问答对,大规模(TLQA-L)含10,000个问答对,每类数据总计生成32,000和160,000个问答对。我们对前沿视频问答模型进行全面评估,采用TLQA测试其在16类不同复杂度时间逻辑下的推理表现。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Temporal logical understanding, a core facet of human cognition, plays a pivotal role in capturing complex sequential events and their temporal relationships within videos. This capability is particularly crucial in tasks like Video Question Answering (VideoQA), where the goal is to process visual data over time together with textual data to provide coherent answers. However, current VideoQA benchmarks devote little focus to evaluating this critical skill due to the challenge of annotating temporal logic. Despite the advancement of vision-language models, assessing their temporal logical reasoning powers remains a challenge, primarily due to the lack QA pairs that demand formal, complex temporal reasoning. To bridge this gap, we introduce the TimeLogic QA (TLQA) framework to automatically generate the QA pairs, specifically designed to evaluate the temporal logical understanding. To this end, TLQA leverages temporal annotations from existing video datasets together with temporal operators derived from logic theory to construct questions that test understanding of event sequences and their temporal relationships. TLQA framework is generic and scalable, capable of leveraging both, existing video action datasets with temporal action segmentation annotations, or video datasets with temporal scene graph annotations, to automatically generate temporal logical questions. We leverage 4 datasets, STAR, Breakfast, AGQA, and CrossTask, and generate two VideoQA dataset variants - small (TLQA-S) and large (TLQA-L) - containing 2k and 10k QA pairs for each category, resulting in 32k and 160k total pairs per dataset. We undertake a comprehensive evaluation of leading-edge VideoQA models, employing the TLQA to benchmark their temporal logical understanding capabilities. We assess the VideoQA model's temporal reasoning performance on 16 categories of temporal logic with varying temporal complexity.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。