arXiv:2501.08921cs.SDeess.AS2025-01被引 1

用模型从听力数据推算语音识别阈值,提升测试结果一致性。

Discrimination loss vs. SRT: A model-based approach towards harmonizing speech test interpretations

  • 基于心理物理模型,从词汇辨识损失数据反推语音识别阈值。
  • 在2.7万例患者数据上验证,估计结果准确但斜率偏差大。
  • 适合处理不完整听力数据,推动多数据库测试结果融合。

目标:语音测试旨在评估辨识损失或语音识别阈值(SRT)。本文研究了利用以辨识损失为目标的临床数据估算SRT的可行性。理解不同测试结果变量间通过心理物理函数关联的关系,对整合不同数据库数据至关重要。设计:根据可用数据,比较并评估了多种SRT估算方法。提出一种新的、基于模型的SRT估算方法,可处理患者数据不完整的情况。评估了两种解释模式下超阈值缺陷的差异。研究样本:回顾性分析包含27009例患者的弗莱堡单音节语音测试(FMST)与同日听力图(AG)结果。结果:基于模型的SRT估算方法提供了准确的SRT,但估计斜率存在较大偏差。两种解释模式下的超阈值听力损失成分不同。结论:该模型方法可用于SRT估算,其性能与个体患者数据可用性相关。所有SRT方法均受词识别分数不确定性的干扰。未来该方法可用于评估更多语音测试间的差异。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Objective: Speech tests aim to estimate discrimination loss or speech recognition threshold (SRT). This paper investigates the potential to estimate SRTs from clinical data that target at characterizing the discrimination loss. Knowledge about the relationship between the speech test outcome variables--conceptually linked via the psychometric function--is important towards integration of data from different databases. Design: Depending on the available data, different SRT estimation procedures were compared and evaluated. A novel, model-based SRT estimation procedure was proposed that deals with incomplete patient data. Interpretations of supra-threshold deficits were assessed for the two interpretation modes. Study sample: Data for 27009 patients with Freiburg monosyllabic speech test (FMST) and audiogram (AG) results from the same day were included in the retrospective analysis. Results: The model-based SRT estimation procedure provided accurate SRTs, but with large deviations in the estimated slope. Supra-threshold hearing loss components differed between the two interpretation modes. Conclusions: The model-based procedure can be used for SRT estimation, and its properties relate to data availability for individual patients. All SRT procedures are influenced by the uncertainty of the word recognition scores. In the future, the proposed approach can be used to assess additional differences between speech tests.

语音识别听力测试心理物理模型推断

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。