用智能算法从步行测试数据中提取跌倒风险指标,精准识别中风患者高危人群。
IFRA: a machine learning-based Instrumented Fall Risk Assessment Scale derived from Instrumented Timed Up and Go test in stroke patients
- 基于动作传感器数据,用机器学习筛选关键移动特征。
- 在142名患者中,对跌倒者识别率达50%以上,显著优于传统量表。
- 适合康复科医生用于中风后患者快速分层筛查。
背景/目的:中风患者跌倒问题严重,亟需有效风险评估工具。本研究提出基于仪器化起立-行走测试(ITUG)数据的仪器化跌倒风险评估(IFRA)量表,旨在捕捉传统量表忽略的运动功能指标。方法:采用两步机器学习方法:首先从ITUG数据中识别预测性运动特征,其次构建分层策略将患者分为低、中、高跌倒风险三类。研究纳入142名参与者,分为训练(含合成案例)、验证和测试集(含22名非跌倒者与10名跌倒者)。通过Fisher精确检验比较IFRA与传统临床量表(如标准TUG、Mini-BESTest)的表现。结果:机器学习识别出垂直与内外向加速度及行走和坐站转换期间的角速度为关键预测因子。IFRA与跌倒状态存在统计学显著关联(Fisher精确检验p=0.004),且是唯一将超过一半实际跌倒者归为高风险类别的量表,在该数据集中表现优于对照量表。结论:本概念验证研究显示,IFRA具备作为自动化、辅助性中风后跌倒风险分层工具的潜力。尽管其在识别高危个体方面表现出良好区分能力,但这些初步发现仍需在更大队列中验证后方可用于临床实践。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Background/Objectives: Falls represent a major health concern for stroke survivors, necessitating effective risk assessment tools. This study proposes the Instrumented Fall Risk Assessment (IFRA) scale, a novel screening tool derived from Instrumented Timed Up and Go (ITUG) test data, designed to capture mobility measures often missed by traditional scales. Methods: We employed a two-step machine learning approach to develop the IFRA scale: first, identifying predictive mobility features from ITUG data and, second, creating a stratification strategy to classify patients into low-, medium-, or high-fall-risk categories. This study included 142 participants, who were divided into training (including synthetic cases), validation, and testing sets (comprising 22 non-fallers and 10 fallers). IFRA's performance was compared against traditional clinical scales (e.g., standard TUG and Mini-BESTest) using Fisher's Exact test. Results: Machine learning analysis identified specific features as key predictors, namely vertical and medio-lateral acceleration, and angular velocity during walking and sit-to-walk transitions. IFRA demonstrated a statistically significant association with fall status (Fisher's Exact test p = 0.004) and was the only scale to assign more than half of the actual fallers to the high-risk category, outperforming the comparative clinical scales in this dataset. Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates IFRA's potential as an automated, complementary approach for fall risk stratification in post-stroke patients. While IFRA shows promising discriminative capability, particularly for identifying high-risk individuals, these preliminary findings require validation in larger cohorts before clinical implementation.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。