arXiv:2501.10674cs.CVcs.CL2025-01被引 25

测试发现主流多模态大模型难以理解视频时间顺序和时长推断。

Can Multimodal LLMs do Visual Temporal Understanding and Reasoning? The answer is No!

  • 构建新评测集TemporalVQA,分时间顺序判断与时长估计两部分。
  • GPT-4o在时间顺序任务中准确率仅49.1%,时长估计达70%。
  • 开源模型表现更差,揭示当前多模态模型时间推理能力严重不足。

多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)在视觉问答(VQA)等任务中取得显著进展,但其在视觉时间理解这一真实世界动态认知关键能力方面仍缺乏深入研究。为此,我们提出一个挑战性评测基准TemporalVQA,包含两部分:1)时间顺序理解,要求模型分析连续视频帧判断事件顺序;2)时间跨度估计,以图像对为输入,通过多选题形式让模型估算图像间时间间隔(范围从秒到年)。对GPT-4o、Gemini-1.5-Pro等先进模型的评估显示,其表现存在明显局限:GPT-4o在时间顺序任务中平均一致准确率为49.1%,时长估计准确率为70%,开源模型表现更差。结果表明当前MLLMs在视觉时间理解与推理方面仍存在显著短板,亟需进一步提升其时间建模能力。数据集已公开于https://huggingface.co/datasets/fazliimam/temporal-vqa。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved significant advancements in tasks like Visual Question Answering (VQA) by leveraging foundational Large Language Models (LLMs). However, their abilities in specific areas such as visual temporal understanding, which is crucial for comprehending real-world dynamics, remain underexplored. To address this, we propose a challenging evaluation benchmark named TemporalVQA, consisting of two parts: 1) Temporal Order Understanding and 2) Time-lapse Estimation. The first part requires MLLMs to determine the sequence of events by analyzing temporally consecutive video frames. The second part presents image pairs with varying time differences, framed as multiple-choice questions, asking MLLMs to estimate the time-lapse between images with options ranging from seconds to years. Our evaluations of advanced MLLMs, including models like GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5-Pro, reveal significant challenges: GPT-4o achieved only 49.1% average consistent accuracy in temporal order task and 70% in time-lapse estimation, with open-source models performing even poorly. These findings underscore the limitations of current MLLMs in visual temporal understanding and reasoning, highlighting the need for further improvements for their temporal capability. Our dataset can be found at https://huggingface.co/datasets/fazliimam/temporal-vqa.

多模态时间理解评测基准

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。