arXiv:2501.11221eess.IVcs.CV2025-01中稿 · publication at the…被引 4

筛选出在不同扫描厚度下稳定且能预测结直肠肝转移生存期的影像组学特征。

Finding Reproducible and Prognostic Radiomic Features in Variable Slice Thickness Contrast Enhanced CT of Colorectal Liver Metastases

  • 通过多参数提取策略评估影像组学特征的可重复性与预后价值。
  • 采用多设置融合特征并剔除低可重复性特征,模型预测效能相当(C-index=0.629)。
  • 研究支持基于数据驱动的方法,优先保留更多特征再按可重复性筛选。

建立影像组学特征的可重复性是其走向临床应用的关键步骤;然而,这些特征还必须与重要临床结局相关,才能服务于个性化医疗。本研究分析了结直肠肝转移(CRLM)患者增强CT扫描中肝实质及最大肝转移灶的影像组学特征的可重复性与预后价值。使用来自美国两家主要癌症中心的81例前瞻性队列数据,评估不同切片厚度重建图像中特征的可重复性;利用公开的单中心队列(197例术前扫描)评估特征与总生存期的关联。从所有图像中提取标准93个特征,共采用8种不同的提取设置。结果显示,最佳可重复性与最强预后判别力的特征设置高度依赖于感兴趣区域和具体特征。尽管最优模型由单一设置生成(C-index=0.630),但通过合并所有设置特征、剔除可重复性低于CCC≥0.85的特征后,仍获得性能相当的模型(C-index=0.629)。研究支持数据驱动的特征提取与选择策略,建议优先包含广泛特征,并在有数据时根据可重复性进行筛选。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Establishing the reproducibility of radiomic signatures is a critical step in the path to clinical adoption of quantitative imaging biomarkers; however, radiomic signatures must also be meaningfully related to an outcome of clinical importance to be of value for personalized medicine. In this study, we analyze both the reproducibility and prognostic value of radiomic features extracted from the liver parenchyma and largest liver metastases in contrast enhanced CT scans of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). A prospective cohort of 81 patients from two major US cancer centers was used to establish the reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from images reconstructed with different slice thicknesses. A publicly available, single-center cohort of 197 preoperative scans from patients who underwent hepatic resection for treatment of CRLM was used to evaluate the prognostic value of features and models to predict overall survival. A standard set of 93 features was extracted from all images, with a set of eight different extractor settings. The feature extraction settings producing the most reproducible, as well as the most prognostically discriminative feature values were highly dependent on both the region of interest and the specific feature in question. While the best overall predictive model was produced using features extracted with a particular setting, without accounting for reproducibility, (C-index = 0.630 (0.603--0.649)) an equivalent-performing model (C-index = 0.629 (0.605--0.645)) was produced by pooling features from all extraction settings, and thresholding features with low reproducibility ($\mathrm{CCC} \geq 0.85$), prior to feature selection. Our findings support a data-driven approach to feature extraction and selection, preferring the inclusion of many features, and narrowing feature selection based on reproducibility when relevant data is available.

影像组学生存预测可重复性CRLM

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。