用学生选择预测生成更像真实错误答案的干扰项
Generating Plausible Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions via Student Choice Prediction
- 通过对比模型判断哪个错误答案更可能被选中,模拟学生误解
- 生成的干扰项被选概率更高,题目区分度提升显著
- 适合教育AI、自动出题系统开发者使用
在教育领域设计多选题时,生成合理的干扰项对识别学生认知误区和准确评估理解水平至关重要。然而,以往干扰项生成研究未能充分关注提升干扰项的迷惑性,导致题目效果下降。本文提出一个训练流程,通过训练模型生成更可能被学生选择的干扰项。首先,训练一个成对排序模型来推理学生可能存在的误解,并评估两个干扰项之间的相对合理性。利用该模型构建成对干扰项排序数据集,再通过直接偏好优化(DPO)训练干扰项生成器,以生成更具迷惑性的干扰项。在计算机科学科目(Python、DB、MLDL)上的实验表明,该成对排序模型能有效识别学生潜在误解,其排序准确率与人类专家相当。此外,所提生成器在生成合理干扰项方面优于多个基线方法,并使题目具备更高的项目区分度(DI)。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
In designing multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in education, creating plausible distractors is crucial for identifying students' misconceptions and gaps in knowledge and accurately assessing their understanding. However, prior studies on distractor generation have not paid sufficient attention to enhancing the difficulty of distractors, resulting in reduced effectiveness of MCQs. This study presents a pipeline for training a model to generate distractors that are more likely to be selected by students. First, we train a pairwise ranker to reason about students' misconceptions and assess the relative plausibility of two distractors. Using this model, we create a dataset of pairwise distractor ranks and then train a distractor generator via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to generate more plausible distractors. Experiments on computer science subjects (Python, DB, MLDL) demonstrate that our pairwise ranker effectively identifies students' potential misunderstandings and achieves ranking accuracy comparable to human experts. Furthermore, our distractor generator outperforms several baselines in generating plausible distractors and produces questions with a higher item discrimination index (DI).
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。