arXiv:2501.13563cs.CVcs.AI2025-01被引 28

针对自动驾驶视觉语言模型的黑盒攻击首次实现,可有效干扰决策链并诱导危险场景。

Black-Box Adversarial Attack on Vision Language Models for Autonomous Driving

  • 通过级联干扰机制,从底层语义误导到高层场景欺骗,破坏模型推理链。
  • 在多个基准上攻击成功率提升13.43%,真实车辆实验中路线完成率下降61.11%。
  • 适合研究自动驾驶安全、对抗样本防御的研究者与开发者参考。

视觉语言模型(VLMs)显著提升了自动驾驶(AD)的推理能力,但对对抗攻击仍高度脆弱。现有研究多聚焦白盒攻击,而更具实际意义的黑盒攻击因难度大仍鲜有探索。本文首次为自动驾驶VLM设计黑盒对抗攻击,识别两大挑战:驾驶推理链的连贯性影响与动态路况适应性。提出级联对抗干扰(CAD)方法,先通过决策链破坏生成误导性语义,确保扰动贯穿整个决策过程;再利用代理VLM构建高风险场景,诱导当前驾驶情境下产生致命错误。在多个自动驾驶VLM和基准上的实验表明,CAD达到当前最优攻击效果,平均性能提升13.43%。真实车辆测试中,路线完成率下降61.11%,车辆直接撞上障碍物。此外,我们发布了包含18,808个对抗视觉问答对的CADA数据集,以推动该领域研究。代码与数据将在论文录用后公开。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Vision-language models (VLMs) have significantly advanced autonomous driving (AD) by enhancing reasoning capabilities; however, these models remain highly susceptible to adversarial attacks. While existing research has explored white-box attacks to some extent, the more practical and challenging black-box scenarios remain largely underexplored due to their inherent difficulty. In this paper, we take the first step toward designing black-box adversarial attacks specifically targeting VLMs in AD. We identify two key challenges for achieving effective black-box attacks in this context: the effectiveness across driving reasoning chains in AD systems and the dynamic nature of driving scenarios. To address this, we propose Cascading Adversarial Disruption (CAD). It first introduces Decision Chain Disruption, which targets low-level reasoning breakdown by generating and injecting deceptive semantics, ensuring the perturbations remain effective across the entire decision-making chain. Building on this, we present Risky Scene Induction, which addresses dynamic adaptation by leveraging a surrogate VLM to understand and construct high-level risky scenarios that are likely to result in critical errors in the current driving contexts. Extensive experiments conducted on multiple AD VLMs and benchmarks demonstrate that CAD achieves state-of-the-art attack effectiveness, significantly outperforming existing methods (+13.43% on average). Moreover, we validate its practical applicability through real-world attacks on AD vehicles powered by VLMs, where the route completion rate drops by 61.11% and the vehicle crashes directly into the obstacle vehicle with adversarial patches. Finally, we release CADA dataset, comprising 18,808 adversarial visual-question-answer pairs, to facilitate further evaluation and research in this critical domain. Our codes and dataset will be available after paper's acceptance.

自动驾驶对抗攻击视觉语言模型安全评估

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。