用选项编号消除法提升大模型多选题答题准确率
Option-ID Based Elimination For Multiple Choice Questions
- 基于选项编号概率设计消除策略,避免直接判断错误选项的偏差
- 在4个数据集上显著提升零样本与少样本表现,尤其在选项多时优势明显
- 适合需要提升大模型选择题推理能力的研究者和开发者
多选题是评估大语言模型的重要任务。现有消除法要么让模型直接识别错误选项,要么评分后替换低分项为[MASK],但均存在适用性差或性能不足的问题。本文提出新型选项ID-based消除法(PoE_ID),引入去偏技术缓解模型对令牌的固有偏好,增强鲁棒性。包含两种策略:PoE_ID^log通过低于平均对数概率的选项编号进行剔除;PoE_ID^seq则迭代移除概率最低的选项。在6个不同大模型和4个多样化数据集上的实验表明,尤其是PoE_ID^log,在零样本与少样本场景下显著提升多选题表现,尤其在选项较多的数据集中效果更优。分析显示该方法增强了模型对正确答案的信心,且消除策略优于依赖[MASK]替换的方法。进一步研究揭示了模型直接识别错误选项的能力受限于其内在缺陷。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are a popular and important task for evaluating large language models (LLMs). Based on common strategies people use when answering MCQs, the process of elimination (PoE) has been proposed as an effective problem-solving method. Existing PoE methods typically either have LLMs directly identify incorrect options or score options and replace lower-scoring ones with [MASK]. However, both methods suffer from inapplicability or suboptimal performance. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel option-ID based PoE ($\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}$). $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}$ critically incorporates a debiasing technique to counteract LLMs token bias, enhancing robustness over naive ID-based elimination. It features two strategies: $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}^{\text{log}}$, which eliminates options whose IDs have log probabilities below the average threshold, and $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}^{\text{seq}}$, which iteratively removes the option with the lowest ID probability. We conduct extensive experiments with 6 different LLMs on 4 diverse datasets. The results demonstrate that $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}$, especially $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}^{\text{log}}$, significantly improves zero-shot and few-shot MCQs performance, particularly in datasets with more options. Our analyses demonstrate that $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}^{\text{log}}$ enhances the LLMs' confidence in selecting the correct option, and the option elimination strategy outperforms methods relying on [MASK] replacement. We further investigate the limitations of LLMs in directly identifying incorrect options, which stem from their inherent deficiencies.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。