开发并验证了测量公众对AI与可持续关系认知的问卷工具
Twin Transition or Competing Interests? Validation of the Artificial Intelligence and Sustainability Perceptions Inventory (AISPI)
- 设计13项问卷，识别出协同转型与利益竞争两大认知维度
- 信度达0.89，与已有态度量表显著相关，验证有效性
- 适合研究者评估公众对AI可持续作用的认知差异
随着人工智能（AI）与可持续发展举措日益交汇，理解公众对二者关系的认知对成功实施至关重要。然而，目前尚无经过验证的测量工具。本文提出并验证了人工智能与可持续性感知量表（AISPI），一项包含13个题项的新工具，用于衡量个体对AI进步与环境可持续性关系的看法。通过因子分析（N=105），我们识别出两个独立维度：协同转型（Twin Transition）与利益竞争（Competing Interests）。该量表展现出较高的信度（alpha=.89）和结构效度，通过与既有AI及可持续性态度量表的相关性得到验证。研究发现，个体可同时认识到AI-可持续关系中的协同效应与矛盾张力，为研究人员与实践者在这一关键交叉领域的工作提供重要启示。本研究为未来关于公众对AI在可持续发展中作用的认知研究提供了基础工具。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
As artificial intelligence (AI) and sustainability initiatives increasingly intersect, understanding public perceptions of their relationship becomes crucial for successful implementation. However, no validated instrument exists to measure these specific perceptions. This paper presents the development and validation of the Artificial Intelligence and Sustainability Perceptions Inventory (AISPI), a novel 13-item instrument measuring how individuals view the relationship between AI advancement and environmental sustainability. Through factor analysis (N=105), we identified two distinct dimensions: Twin Transition and Competing Interests. The instrument demonstrated strong reliability (alpha=.89) and construct validity through correlations with established measures of AI and sustainability attitudes. Our findings suggest that individuals can simultaneously recognize both synergies and tensions in the AI-sustainability relationship, offering important implications for researchers and practitioners working at this critical intersection. This work provides a foundational tool for future research on public perceptions of AI's role in sustainable development.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。