arXiv:2501.15724cs.CVcs.AI2025-01综述被引 34

系统梳理病理学基础模型的数据、适配与评估体系

A Survey on Computational Pathology Foundation Models: Datasets, Adaptation Strategies, and Evaluation Tasks

  • 按单模态与多模态框架分类,分析自监督学习技术
  • 指出现有研究在数据可及性与评估标准上的短板
  • 适合想进入病理AI的科研与临床人员参考

计算病理学基础模型(CPathFMs)作为分析组织病理图像的强大方法,利用自监督学习从无标注全切片图像中提取鲁棒特征表示。这些模型分为单模态与多模态框架,在分割、分类和生物标志物发现等复杂病理任务中展现出潜力。然而,其发展面临数据获取受限、数据集间差异大、需领域特定适配以及缺乏标准化评估基准等挑战。本文综述了计算病理学基础模型的现状,重点涵盖数据集、适配策略与评估任务,分析对比学习与多模态融合等关键技术,揭示当前研究的空白。最后从四个维度探讨未来方向,为研究人员、临床医生与AI从业者提供推进鲁棒且可临床应用的病理人工智能解决方案的参考。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Computational pathology foundation models (CPathFMs) have emerged as a powerful approach for analyzing histopathological data, leveraging self-supervised learning to extract robust feature representations from unlabeled whole-slide images. These models, categorized into uni-modal and multi-modal frameworks, have demonstrated promise in automating complex pathology tasks such as segmentation, classification, and biomarker discovery. However, the development of CPathFMs presents significant challenges, such as limited data accessibility, high variability across datasets, the necessity for domain-specific adaptation, and the lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks. This survey provides a comprehensive review of CPathFMs in computational pathology, focusing on datasets, adaptation strategies, and evaluation tasks. We analyze key techniques, such as contrastive learning and multi-modal integration, and highlight existing gaps in current research. Finally, we explore future directions from four perspectives for advancing CPathFMs. This survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and AI practitioners, guiding the advancement of CPathFMs toward robust and clinically applicable AI-driven pathology solutions.

病理AI基础模型自监督数据集

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。