反思生成式AI在设计教育中的能耗问题，提出五种可持续使用策略。
The Unbearable Lightness of Prompting: A Critical Reflection on the Environmental Impact of genAI use in Design Education
- 基于49名学生参与的2023年工作坊，分析生成式AI的环境成本。
- 提出五种支持意识化使用的替代立场与具体行动方案。
- 适合关注AI伦理与可持续教育的设计与人机交互研究者。
设计教育者正探索如何帮助学生熟练运用生成式AI工具，同时培养对技术伦理与社会影响的批判性思考。然而，环境可持续性问题仍未被重视：缺乏了解生成式AI教育使用成本的资源，也缺少应对该问题的共享实践。本文通过2023年一场有49名学生参与的工作坊，深入反思生成式AI在设计教育中的能源消耗问题。在此基础上，提出五种替代性立场及其对应行动，以促进生成式AI在设计教育中的自觉使用。该研究为设计与人机交互领域提供了教育实践反思框架，有助于未来生成式AI教育项目的可持续发展。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Design educators are finding ways to support students in skillfully using GenAI tools in their practices while encouraging the critical scrutiny of the ethical and social issues around these technologies. However, the issue of environmental sustainability remains unaddressed. There is a lack of both resources to grasp the environmental costs of genAI in education and a lack of shared practices for engaging with the issue. This paper critically reflects on the energy costs of using genAI in design education, using a workshop held in 2023 with 49 students as a motivating example. Through this reflection, we develop a set of five alternative stances, with related actions, that support the conscious use of genAI in design education. The work contributes to the field of design and HCI by bringing together ways for educators to reflect on their practices, informing the future development of educational programs around genAI.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。