用机器学习自动识别凹版印刷中的流体图案,准确率超人类。
Reduced-order modeling and classification of hydrodynamic pattern formation in gravure printing
- 通过奇异值分解降维,结合kNN分类器实现高效模式识别。
- 最佳模型测试错误率仅3%,比人工识别低7个百分点。
- 可生成工艺参数与图案的映射图,指导打印质量调控。
凹版印刷中的流体图案形成机制尚不明确,但理解其规律对高质量印刷至关重要,尤其在柔性电子、图形印刷和生物医学印刷等领域。本文基于大型图像数据集HYPA-p(含26,880张标注图像,97%未标注),开发了一种自动化图案分类算法。采用奇异值分解(SVD)对标注图像进行降维,再利用多种机器学习方法训练分类模型。研究了分类器选择、快速傅里叶变换(FFT)预处理、数据平衡与归一化的影响。最优模型为未经数据平衡、经FFT预处理的kNN分类器,测试错误率仅3%,优于人类观察者7%。数据平衡虽使错误率升至5%,但混合类召回率从90%提升至94%。最终展示了模型对未标注图像的预测能力,并构建了图案类别与印刷工艺参数的关联图谱(regime maps)。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Hydrodynamic pattern formation phenomena in printing and coating processes are still not fully understood. However, fundamental understanding is essential to achieve high-quality printed products and to tune printed patterns according to the needs of a specific application like printed electronics, graphical printing, or biomedical printing. The aim of the paper is to develop an automated pattern classification algorithm based on methods from supervised machine learning and reduced-order modeling. We use the HYPA-p dataset, a large image dataset of gravure-printed images, which shows various types of hydrodynamic pattern formation phenomena. It enables the correlation of printing process parameters and resulting printed patterns for the first time. 26880 images of the HYPA-p dataset have been labeled by a human observer as dot patterns, mixed patterns, or finger patterns; 864000 images (97%) are unlabeled. A singular value decomposition (SVD) is used to find the modes of the labeled images and to reduce the dimensionality of the full dataset by truncation and projection. Selected machine learning classification techniques are trained on the reduced-order data. We investigate the effect of several factors, including classifier choice, whether or not fast Fourier transform (FFT) is used to preprocess the labeled images, data balancing, and data normalization. The best performing model is a k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifier trained on unbalanced, FFT-transformed data with a test error of 3%, which outperforms a human observer by 7%. Data balancing slightly increases the test error of the kNN-model to 5%, but also increases the recall of the mixed class from 90% to 94%. Finally, we demonstrate how the trained models can be used to predict the pattern class of unlabeled images and how the predictions can be correlated to the printing process parameters, in the form of regime maps.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。