arXiv:2501.17366cs.LGcs.AI2025-01被引 11

用LSTM预测标普500表现优于传统模型,尤其擅长捕捉长期走势。

Forecasting S&P 500 Using LSTM Models

  • 采用LSTM网络处理序列数据,自动学习市场长期依赖关系。
  • 无额外特征的LSTM模型MAE仅175.9,准确率达96.41%。
  • 适合量化交易、金融风控等需精准预测的场景。

由于金融数据受外部因素影响具有高度波动性和复杂性,股票市场预测极具挑战。传统模型如ARIMA和GARCH在处理线性数据时表现良好,但在应对非线性依赖时效果有限。机器学习与深度学习模型,特别是长短期记忆(LSTM)网络,能有效捕捉复杂模式与长期依赖。本报告对比了ARIMA与LSTM模型对标普500指数的预测能力。基于历史价格数据和技术指标,使用平均绝对误差(MAE)与均方根误差(RMSE)进行评估。ARIMA模型表现合理,MAE为462.1,RMSE为614,准确率89.8%,可有效捕捉短期趋势但受限于线性假设。LSTM模型通过序列建模能力,表现更优:MAE为369.32,RMSE为412.84,准确率92.46%,同时捕捉短长期依赖。值得注意的是,不依赖额外特征的LSTM模型表现最佳,MAE为175.9,RMSE为207.34,准确率高达96.41%,展现了其对市场数据的高效处理能力。准确预测股价对投资策略、风险评估与市场稳定至关重要。研究结果证实深度学习模型在处理波动性金融数据方面优于传统方法,凸显LSTM的有效性,并指明进一步优化方向。本研究为金融预测提供了对比分析,阐明了两类模型的优势与局限。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

With the volatile and complex nature of financial data influenced by external factors, forecasting the stock market is challenging. Traditional models such as ARIMA and GARCH perform well with linear data but struggle with non-linear dependencies. Machine learning and deep learning models, particularly Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, address these challenges by capturing intricate patterns and long-term dependencies. This report compares ARIMA and LSTM models in predicting the S&P 500 index, a major financial benchmark. Using historical price data and technical indicators, we evaluated these models using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The ARIMA model showed reasonable performance with an MAE of 462.1, RMSE of 614, and 89.8 percent accuracy, effectively capturing short-term trends but limited by its linear assumptions. The LSTM model, leveraging sequential processing capabilities, outperformed ARIMA with an MAE of 369.32, RMSE of 412.84, and 92.46 percent accuracy, capturing both short- and long-term dependencies. Notably, the LSTM model without additional features performed best, achieving an MAE of 175.9, RMSE of 207.34, and 96.41 percent accuracy, showcasing its ability to handle market data efficiently. Accurately predicting stock movements is crucial for investment strategies, risk assessments, and market stability. Our findings confirm the potential of deep learning models in handling volatile financial data compared to traditional ones. The results highlight the effectiveness of LSTM and suggest avenues for further improvements. This study provides insights into financial forecasting, offering a comparative analysis of ARIMA and LSTM while outlining their strengths and limitations.

金融预测LSTM时间序列量化投资

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。