用深度学习从引力波数据中分离并重建信号与噪声脉冲
DeepExtractor: Time-domain reconstruction of signals and glitches in gravitational wave data with deep learning
- 通过建模探测器噪声分布,预测并减去噪声成分
- 对模拟脉冲重建误差仅0.9%,且单次处理快至0.1秒
- 适合需要快速分析真实引力波数据的科研人员
引力波探测器如LIGO、Virgo和KAGRA能探测遥远天体事件的微弱信号,但其高灵敏度也使其易受背景噪声影响,其中瞬态伪信号(称为'脉冲')可能模仿真实信号或掩盖其特征。本文提出DeepExtractor,一种深度学习框架,可重建功率超过干涉仪噪声的信号与脉冲,无论其来源如何。该模型基于噪声为短时平稳高斯分布的假设,通过预测并减去噪声分量,保留干净的信号或脉冲重建结果。我们通过三项实验验证其有效性:(1) 在模拟噪声中注入的模拟脉冲重建;(2) 与当前最优的BayesWave算法对比性能;(3) 使用Gravity Spy数据集的真实引力波数据进行脉冲剔除分析。此外,我们还展示了无需训练于引力波波形即可重建三例LIGO第三轮观测的真实事件。DeepExtractor在模拟脉冲上的中位失配仅为0.9%,优于多个深度学习基线。相比BayesWave每脉冲需约一小时,其在CPU上单次处理仅需约0.1秒,实现显著计算加速。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Gravitational wave (GW) detectors, such as LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA, detect faint signals from distant astrophysical events. However, their high sensitivity also makes them susceptible to background noise, which can obscure these signals. This noise often includes transient artifacts called 'glitches', that can mimic genuine astrophysical signals or mask their true characteristics. In this study, we present DeepExtractor, a deep learning framework that is designed to reconstruct signals and glitches with power exceeding interferometer noise, regardless of their source. We design DeepExtractor to model the inherent noise distribution of GW detectors, following conventional assumptions that the noise is Gaussian and stationary over short time scales. It operates by predicting and subtracting the noise component of the data, retaining only the clean reconstruction of signal or glitch. We focus on applications related to glitches and validate DeepExtractor's effectiveness through three experiments: (1) reconstructing simulated glitches injected into simulated detector noise, (2) comparing its performance with the state-of-the-art BayesWave algorithm, and (3) analyzing real data from the Gravity Spy dataset to demonstrate effective glitch subtraction from LIGO strain data. We further demonstrate its potential by reconstructing three real GW events from LIGO's third observing run, without being trained on GW waveforms. Our proposed model achieves a median mismatch of only 0.9% for simulated glitches, outperforming several deep learning baselines. Additionally, DeepExtractor surpasses BayesWave in glitch recovery, offering a dramatic computational speedup by reconstructing one glitch sample in approximately 0.1 seconds on a CPU, compared to BayesWave's processing time of approximately one hour per glitch.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。