分析社交媒体如何加剧观点分裂，破坏公共对话
From Public Square to Echo Chamber: The Fragmentation of Online Discourse
- 结合哲学与计算方法，研究算法如何放大歧视性言论
- 揭示平台结构助长极化，阻碍跨群体对话
- 适合关注数字社会、舆论生态的研究者阅读
本文探讨社交平台算法与信息茧房如何导致线上话语的碎片化，加剧意识形态分歧，削弱共同理解。基于迈克尔·桑德尔关于社区与共享价值的哲学观点，研究分析了在社会紧张时期，平台如何放大性别歧视、种族主义、排外情绪、能力歧视、恐同及宗教偏见等歧视性言论。通过考察数字社群动态，研究揭示了现实事件触发下话语碎片生成与演变的机制。结果表明，社交媒体结构加剧了对立，限制跨群体交流，侵蚀公正社会所需的集体理性。本研究将哲学视角融入对社交互动的计算分析，为数字时代话语碎片化的挑战提供了深入理解。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This paper examines how social media algorithms and filter bubbles contribute to the fragmentation of online discourse, fostering ideological divides and undermining shared understanding. Drawing on Michael Sandels philosophical emphasis on community and shared values, the study explores how digital platforms amplify discrimination discourse including sexism, racism, xenophobia, ableism, homophobia, and religious intolerance during periods of heightened societal tension. By analyzing the dynamics of digital communities, the research highlights mechanisms driving the emergence and evolution of discourse fragments in response to real world events. The findings reveal how social media structures exacerbate polarization, restrict cross group dialogue, and erode the collective reasoning essential for a just society. This study situates philosophical perspectives within a computational analysis of social media interactions, offering a nuanced understanding of the challenges posed by fragmented discourse in the digital age.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。