首个系统研究音频差异解释的论文,提出新数据集与模型提升语音描述能力。
ADIFF: Explaining audio difference using natural language
- 用LLM生成三层次音频差异描述,涵盖事件、场景与情绪。
- 提出ADIFF模型,跨投影与位置标注显著提升细节解释力。
- 适合音频取证、音视频生成等需要人类级听觉分析的场景。
理解并解释音频录音间的差异对音频取证、质量评估和音频生成等领域至关重要,涉及识别音频事件、声学场景、信号特性及其对听者的感情影响。本文首次系统研究音频差异解释任务,并提出基准数据集与基线方法。基于AudioCaps和Clotho数据集构建两个新数据集,利用大语言模型(LLM)生成三层次差异解释:(1)音频事件与物体的简洁描述;(2)事件、声学场景与信号属性的简短句子;(3)包含语义与听者情绪的综合解释。采用前缀微调方法,以两个音频文件的嵌入作为冻结语言模型的提示。实证分析与消融实验表明,朴素基线难以区分感知相似声音,且无法生成第三层详细解释。为此,我们提出ADIFF模型,引入交叉投影模块、位置标注和三阶段训练流程,显著增强模型生成细致解释的能力。通过客观指标与人工评估验证,ADIFF在性能上超越朴素基线及当前最优音频-语言模型Qwen Audio。多组消融实验进一步分析了交叉投影、语言模型参数量、位置标注、第三阶段微调的影响。本工作提供的基准、发现与强基线为实现细腻、类人化的音频差异解释奠定基础。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Understanding and explaining differences between audio recordings is crucial for fields like audio forensics, quality assessment, and audio generation. This involves identifying and describing audio events, acoustic scenes, signal characteristics, and their emotional impact on listeners. This paper stands out as the first work to comprehensively study the task of explaining audio differences and then propose benchmark, baselines for the task. First, we present two new datasets for audio difference explanation derived from the AudioCaps and Clotho audio captioning datasets. Using Large Language Models (LLMs), we generate three levels of difference explanations: (1) concise descriptions of audio events and objects, (2) brief sentences about audio events, acoustic scenes, and signal properties, and (3) comprehensive explanations that include semantics and listener emotions. For the baseline, we use prefix tuning where audio embeddings from two audio files are used to prompt a frozen language model. Our empirical analysis and ablation studies reveal that the naive baseline struggles to distinguish perceptually similar sounds and generate detailed tier 3 explanations. To address these limitations, we propose ADIFF, which introduces a cross-projection module, position captioning, and a three-step training process to enhance the model's ability to produce detailed explanations. We evaluate our model using objective metrics and human evaluation and show our model enhancements lead to significant improvements in performance over naive baseline and SoTA Audio-Language Model (ALM) Qwen Audio. Lastly, we conduct multiple ablation studies to study the effects of cross-projection, language model parameters, position captioning, third stage fine-tuning, and present our findings. Our benchmarks, findings, and strong baseline pave the way for nuanced and human-like explanations of audio differences.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。