arXiv:2502.07943cs.DBcs.AI2025-02被引 4

用文学细读法分析数据模型,揭示其社会技术背景

CREDAL: Close Reading of Data Models

  • 借鉴文学批评方法,系统化解读数据模型的深层结构
  • 通过定性评估验证方法在批判性研究中的可用性与有效性
  • 适合数据科学从业者反思技术背后的社会政治因素

数据模型是数据及数据驱动系统诞生的基础,所有算法、机器学习模型、统计模型和数据库都依赖于底层数据模型。因此,数据模型是探究数据系统形成条件(物质、社会、政治等)的理想切入点。受文学批评启发,我们提出以细读方式分析数据模型,重拾技术系统的物质性、谱系、技艺、封闭性与设计本质。尽管文学理论强调阅读无唯一正解,但对缺乏细读训练的计算与数据科学从业者而言,系统指导仍至关重要。目前尚无针对数据模型的系统性细读方法。为此,我们提出CREDAL方法论,详述其迭代开发过程,并通过定性评估证明其在数据批判研究中的可用性、有用性和有效性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Data models are necessary for the birth of data and of any data-driven system. Indeed, every algorithm, every machine learning model, every statistical model, and every database has an underlying data model without which the system would not be usable. Hence, data models are excellent sites for interrogating the (material, social, political, ...) conditions giving rise to a data system. Towards this, drawing inspiration from literary criticism, we propose to closely read data models in the same spirit as we closely read literary artifacts. Close readings of data models reconnect us with, among other things, the materiality, the genealogies, the techne, the closed nature, and the design of technical systems. While recognizing from literary theory that there is no one correct way to read, it is nonetheless critical to have systematic guidance for those unfamiliar with close readings. This is especially true for those trained in the computing and data sciences, who too often are enculturated to set aside the socio-political aspects of data work. A systematic methodology for reading data models currently does not exist. To fill this gap, we present the CREDAL methodology for close readings of data models. We detail our iterative development process and present results of a qualitative evaluation of CREDAL demonstrating its usability, usefulness, and effectiveness in the critical study of data.

数据模型细读方法批判性分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。