剖析多模态大模型剪枝的误区,揭示高效剪枝的关键因素
Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models: Are We Solving the Right Problem?
- 系统分析现有剪枝方法失效原因,指出注意力评分不靠谱
- 发现语言信息对剪枝帮助有限,冗余度与重要性需平衡
- 提出更全面的评估框架,适合研究剪枝算法的学者
多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)在跨模态理解与生成任务中表现卓越,但推理成本高昂。近期大量工作采用令牌剪枝技术,在不训练的前提下通过识别冗余令牌并移除以降低计算和键值存储开销,实现显著加速。然而,这些方法在设计与评估上存在根本性问题:为何许多方法性能甚至不如随机剪枝?基于注意力的评分是否足以可靠识别冗余令牌?语言信息在剪枝过程中真的有用吗?如何权衡令牌重要性与重复性?当前评估协议是否全面且无偏?本文逐一回答这些问题,为未来剪枝方法的设计提供深刻洞见。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown remarkable performance for cross-modal understanding and generation, yet still suffer from severe inference costs. Recently, abundant works have been proposed to solve this problem with token pruning, which identifies the redundant tokens in MLLMs and then prunes them to reduce the computation and KV storage costs, leading to significant acceleration without training. While these methods claim efficiency gains, critical questions about their fundamental design and evaluation remain unanswered: Why do many existing approaches underperform even compared to naive random token selection? Are attention-based scoring sufficient for reliably identifying redundant tokens? Is language information really helpful during token pruning? What makes a good trade-off between token importance and duplication? Are current evaluation protocols comprehensive and unbiased? The ignorance of previous research on these problems hinders the long-term development of token pruning. In this paper, we answer these questions one by one, providing insights into the design of future token pruning methods.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。