arXiv:2502.12430cs.LGcs.AI2025-02NeurIPS被引 7

让机器遗忘技术匹配AI监管需求,填补技术与法规间的鸿沟

Position: Bridge the Gaps between Machine Unlearning and AI Regulation

  • 以欧盟人工智能法案为案例,梳理机器遗忘的合规应用潜力
  • 指出现有技术无法满足多数法规条款的遗忘要求
  • 呼吁研究者攻克关键技术难题,推动监管落地

「被遗忘的权利」及其所体现的数据隐私法催生了机器遗忘技术。如今,一些人认为欧盟《人工智能法案》(AIA)等新兴人工智能监管政策可能为机器遗忘提供重要新场景。然而,本文指出,这一机遇能否实现,取决于研究人员是否主动弥合当前机器遗忘技术水平与其在人工智能监管中潜在应用之间的差距。为此,本文以AIA为主要案例研究,系统梳理机器遗忘在满足AIA各项条款合规要求方面的潜力,明确列出每一项潜在应用与当前技术能力之间的具体技术缺口。最后,本文发出呼吁:机器学习研究者需解决这些开放性技术问题,从而释放机器遗忘在支持AIA及其他类似人工智能监管合规中的潜力。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The ''right to be forgotten'' and the data privacy laws that encode it have motivated machine unlearning since its earliest days. Now, some argue that an inbound wave of artificial intelligence regulations -- like the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) -- may offer important new use cases for machine unlearning. However, this position paper argues, this opportunity will only be realized if researchers proactively bridge the (sometimes sizable) gaps between machine unlearning's state of the art and its potential applications to AI regulation. To demonstrate this point, we use the AIA as our primary case study. Specifically, we deliver a ``state of the union'' as regards machine unlearning's current potential (or, in many cases, lack thereof) for aiding compliance with various provisions of the AIA. This starts with a precise cataloging of the potential applications of machine unlearning to AIA compliance. For each, we flag the technical gaps that exist between the potential application and the state of the art of machine unlearning. Finally, we end with a call to action: for machine learning researchers to solve the open technical questions that could unlock machine unlearning's potential to assist compliance with the AIA -- and other AI regulations like it.

机器遗忘AI监管合规

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。