arXiv:2502.15652cs.AIcs.CL2025-02IJCAI综述被引 86

系统梳理大模型逻辑推理短板与解决方案

Empowering LLMs with Logical Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey

  • 按外部求解器、提示工程、微调三类方法分类提升逻辑问答能力
  • 发现主流模型存在自相矛盾问题,如麻雀有翅膀却答无
  • 适合研究大模型推理可靠性与一致性机制的学者

大语言模型在诸多任务上表现优异,但逻辑推理能力仍存显著挑战,主要体现在两方面:(1) 复杂逻辑问题下的问答能力不足,需依赖演绎、归纳或溯因推理;(2) 回应间存在逻辑不一致,例如先进问答模型 Macaw 将麻雀视为鸟且鸟有翅膀,却回答麻雀无翅膀。为推动该方向研究,本文全面调研前沿方法并提出详细分类体系。针对复杂逻辑问题的准确回答,现有方法可依是否依赖外部求解器、提示工程或微调进行分类。针对逻辑一致性问题,讨论了蕴含、否定、传递性、事实性等一致性概念及其组合形式。此外,综述常用基准数据集与评估指标,并探讨未来方向,如扩展至模态逻辑以处理不确定性,以及开发同时满足多重逻辑一致性的高效算法。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable successes on various tasks. However, recent studies have found that there are still significant challenges to the logical reasoning abilities of LLMs, which can be categorized into the following two aspects: (1) Logical question answering: LLMs often fail to generate the correct answer within a complex logical problem which requires sophisticated deductive, inductive or abductive reasoning given a collection of premises. (2) Logical consistency: LLMs are prone to producing responses contradicting themselves across different questions. For example, a state-of-the-art question-answering LLM Macaw, answers Yes to both questions Is a magpie a bird? and Does a bird have wings? but answers No to Does a magpie have wings?. To facilitate this research direction, we comprehensively investigate the most cutting-edge methods and propose a detailed taxonomy. Specifically, to accurately answer complex logic questions, previous methods can be categorized based on reliance on external solvers, prompts, and fine-tuning. To avoid logical contradictions, we discuss concepts and solutions of various logical consistencies, including implication, negation, transitivity, factuality consistencies, and their composites. In addition, we review commonly used benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics, and discuss promising research directions, such as extending to modal logic to account for uncertainty and developing efficient algorithms that simultaneously satisfy multiple logical consistencies.

逻辑推理大模型一致性评估

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。