arXiv:2502.15859cs.CYcs.AI2025-02被引 1

评估14国AI治理水平,助力制定更有效的监管策略。

AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) 2024

  • 基于四大支柱构建评估体系,覆盖18个维度
  • 对14国进行量化评分,揭示治理阶段与短板
  • 为各国优化AI治理体系提供数据支持

人工智能技术的快速发展正在深刻重塑人类社会,同时也带来一系列伦理、法律与社会问题。有效治理人工智能已成为全球关注焦点。自2022年以来,生成式AI尤其是大语言模型的大规模部署,标志着AI治理进入新阶段。国际社会持续应对由此带来的新挑战。随着全球治理共识逐步形成并付诸实践,开展全球AI治理状况评估的重要性日益凸显。为此,我们启动了人工智能国际治理评估指数(AGILE Index)的研制工作。遵循“治理水平应匹配发展水平”的设计原则,首期评估围绕人工智能发展水平、治理环境、治理工具与治理成效四大基础支柱展开,涵盖18个维度、39项指标,全面评估全球14个代表性国家的AI治理水平。该指数首次对14个国家的治理现状进行系统性评估,旨在通过数据打分描绘各国治理现状,帮助识别治理阶段与关键问题,最终为提升各国AI治理体系提供参考依据。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is profoundly transforming human society and concurrently presenting a series of ethical, legal, and social issues. The effective governance of AI has become a crucial global concern. Since 2022, the extensive deployment of generative AI, particularly large language models, marked a new phase in AI governance. Continuous efforts are being made by the international community in actively addressing the novel challenges posed by these AI developments. As consensus on international governance continues to be established and put into action, the practical importance of conducting a global assessment of the state of AI governance is progressively coming to light. In this context, we initiated the development of the AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index). Adhering to the design principle, "the level of governance should match the level of development," the inaugural evaluation of the AGILE Index commences with an exploration of four foundational pillars: the development level of AI, the AI governance environment, the AI governance instruments, and the AI governance effectiveness. It covers 39 indicators across 18 dimensions to comprehensively assess the AI governance level of 14 representative countries globally. The index is utilized to delve into the status of AI governance to date in 14 countries for the first batch of evaluation. The aim is to depict the current state of AI governance in these countries through data scoring, assist them in identifying their governance stage and uncovering governance issues, and ultimately offer insights for the enhancement of their AI governance systems.

AI治理评估指数国际比较

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。