arXiv:2502.17624physics.geo-phcs.AI2025-02

用深度神经网络实现物理引导的伪谱全波形反演,提升成像精度与稳定性。

Theory-guided Pseudo-spectral Full Waveform Inversion via Deep Neural Networks

  • 构建基于循环神经网络的物理引导伪谱反演框架,融合波动方程先验知识。
  • 在二维Marmousi数据上误差仅0.05,相对误差1.45%,优于传统方法。
  • 适合地震成像、地质构造解析等需要高精度反演的应用场景。

全波形反演(FWI)通过多变量优化求解地震逆问题,以获得高分辨率地下模型。尽管技术成熟,但在复杂环境中仍受限于正演求解器的选择,且完整重建常需宽角、多方位数据,往往难以获取。深度学习作为优化框架展现出优势:数据驱动方法不依赖波传播模型,避免建模误差。而确定性模型则遵循物理规律。近期,地震FWI开始被纳入深度学习框架,但研究集中于时域,伪谱域尚未探索。本文填补这一空白,将伪谱FWI重构为理论引导的深度学习算法,提出新型循环神经网络框架。在合成数据及二维Marmousi数据集上评估,相比确定性和时域方法,该方法误差仅为0.05,相对百分比误差1.45%,收敛更稳定,能更好识别断层,低频成分更丰富;且在浅层与深层边缘检测中表现更优,得益于更清洁的接收点残差。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Full-Waveform Inversion seeks to achieve a high-resolution model of the subsurface through the application of multi-variate optimization to the seismic inverse problem. Although now a mature technology, FWI has limitations related to the choice of the appropriate solver for the forward problem in challenging environments requiring complex assumptions, and very wide angle and multi-azimuth data necessary for full reconstruction are often not available. Deep Learning techniques have emerged as excellent optimization frameworks. Data-driven methods do not impose a wave propagation model and are not exposed to modelling errors. On the contrary, deterministic models are governed by the laws of physics. Seismic FWI has recently started to be investigated as a Deep Learning framework. Focus has been on the time-domain, while the pseudo-spectral domain has not been yet explored. However, classical FWI experienced major breakthroughs when pseudo-spectral approaches were employed. This work addresses the lacuna that exists in incorporating the pseudo-spectral approach within Deep Learning. This has been done by re-formulating the pseudo-spectral FWI problem as a Deep Learning algorithm for a theory-driven pseudo-spectral approach. A novel Recurrent Neural Network framework is proposed. This is qualitatively assessed on synthetic data, applied to a two-dimensional Marmousi dataset and evaluated against deterministic and time-based approaches. Pseudo-spectral theory-guided FWI using RNN was shown to be more accurate than classical FWI with only 0.05 error tolerance and 1.45\% relative percent-age error. Indeed, this provides more stable convergence, able to identify faults better and has more low frequency content than classical FWI. Moreover, RNN was more suited than classical FWI at edge detection in the shallow and deep sections due to cleaner receiver residuals.

地震反演深度学习伪谱法神经网络

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。