arXiv:2502.17639cs.CYcs.AI2025-02被引 1

为肺癌早期检测AI模型建立可重复验证的质量保障体系

Requirements for Quality Assurance of AI Models for Early Detection of Lung Cancer

  • 基于真实筛查病例与体模数据构建验证基准集
  • 要求持续更新数据以应对人口与技术变化
  • 适合监管机构、医院采购及AI开发者参考

肺癌是全球第二常见癌症,也是癌症死亡主因。生存率高度依赖诊断时肿瘤分期,低剂量CT实现早期检测可显著降低高危人群死亡率。AI能提升肺结节的检测、测量与特征分析效率并缩短评估时间。然而现有AI系统在训练数据、功能和性能上差异显著,导致软件选型与监管评估困难。制造商需说明预期用途并提供测试统计,但可自主选择训练与测试数据,削弱了标准化与可比性。根据欧盟人工智能法案,基于AI的结节检测、测量与特征分析必须具备一致的质量保障。本文提出以经验证的参考数据集为基础的系统性质量保障方案,包含真实筛查病例及体模数据,用于验证体积与生长速率测量。数据集应定期更新,以反映人口结构变迁与技术进步,确保长期适用性。同时指出监管挑战:MDR与欧盟人工智能法案虽设基本要求,但未充分涵盖自学习算法及其更新机制。建立基于敏感性、特异性与体积准确性的标准化透明评估体系,可客观评价各AI解决方案优劣。明确测试标准并持续使用更新的参考数据,为性能指标可比性奠定基础,有助于招标、指南与推荐制定。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Survival largely depends on tumor stage at diagnosis, and early detection with low-dose CT can significantly reduce mortality in high-risk patients. AI can improve the detection, measurement, and characterization of pulmonary nodules while reducing assessment time. However, the training data, functionality, and performance of available AI systems vary considerably, complicating software selection and regulatory evaluation. Manufacturers must specify intended use and provide test statistics, but they can choose their training and test data, limiting standardization and comparability. Under the EU AI Act, consistent quality assurance is required for AI-based nodule detection, measurement, and characterization. This position paper proposes systematic quality assurance grounded in a validated reference dataset, including real screening cases plus phantom data to verify volume and growth rate measurements. Regular updates shall reflect demographic shifts and technological advances, ensuring ongoing relevance. Consequently, ongoing AI quality assurance is vital. Regulatory challenges are also adressed. While the MDR and the EU AI Act set baseline requirements, they do not adequately address self-learning algorithms or their updates. A standardized, transparent quality assessment - based on sensitivity, specificity, and volumetric accuracy - enables an objective evaluation of each AI solution's strengths and weaknesses. Establishing clear testing criteria and systematically using updated reference data lay the groundwork for comparable performance metrics, informing tenders, guidelines, and recommendations.

肺癌筛查AI质量保障医学影像

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。