将人类偏好与可验证正确性信号结合,提升奖励模型可靠性
Agentic Reward Modeling: Integrating Human Preferences with Verifiable Correctness Signals for Reliable Reward Systems
- 用人类偏好+事实性+指令遵循三重信号构建智能奖励代理
- 在真实任务中显著优于传统奖励模型,最佳选择搜索效果提升明显
- 适合追求高可靠性的大模型训练与推理优化的研究者
奖励模型(RMs)对大语言模型(LLMs)的训练和推理扩展至关重要。然而,现有奖励模型主要依赖人类偏好,忽视了具有潜力的可验证正确性信号。本文提出代理式奖励建模(Agentic Reward Modeling),将不同维度的可验证正确性信号与奖励模型融合,构建更可靠的奖励系统。我们实证实现了一个名为RewardAgent的奖励代理,整合人类偏好、事实性和指令遵循两类可验证信号,提供更可靠的奖励。在多个现有奖励模型基准及真实下游任务的推理阶段最优选择(best-of-n)搜索中,RewardAgent显著优于基线模型。进一步地,我们使用RewardAgent生成训练偏好对,并以DPO目标训练大模型,在多个NLP基准上表现超越传统方法。代码已开源(https://github.com/THU-KEG/Agentic-Reward-Modeling),便于后续研究。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Reward models (RMs) are crucial for the training and inference-time scaling up of large language models (LLMs). However, existing reward models primarily focus on human preferences, neglecting verifiable correctness signals which have shown strong potential in training LLMs. In this paper, we propose agentic reward modeling, a reward system that combines reward models with verifiable correctness signals from different aspects to provide reliable rewards. We empirically implement a reward agent, named RewardAgent, that combines human preference rewards with two verifiable signals: factuality and instruction following, to provide more reliable rewards. We conduct comprehensive experiments on existing reward model benchmarks and inference time best-of-n searches on real-world downstream tasks. RewardAgent significantly outperforms vanilla reward models, demonstrating its effectiveness. We further construct training preference pairs using RewardAgent and train an LLM with the DPO objective, achieving superior performance on various NLP benchmarks compared to conventional reward models. Our codes are publicly released to facilitate further research (https://github.com/THU-KEG/Agentic-Reward-Modeling).
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。