arXiv:2502.19545cs.CLcs.AI2025-02被引 1

用合成数据和自训练,小模型也能低成本防幻觉。

Winning Big with Small Models: Knowledge Distillation vs. Self-Training for Reducing Hallucination in Product QA Agents

  • 用自训练替代知识蒸馏,降低幻觉。
  • 合成数据比人工标注更有效减少错误。
  • 适合想降本增效的智能客服开发者。

大型语言模型(LLMs)在客户支持中的应用受限于幻觉(生成虚假信息)和专有模型的高成本。为此,我们提出一种检索增强型问答(QA)流程,并探索如何平衡人工输入与自动化。基于三星智能电视用户手册的问题数据集,我们发现由LLM生成的合成数据在减少微调模型幻觉方面优于众包数据。我们还对比了自训练(用自身输出微调)与知识蒸馏(用更强模型如GPT-4o的输出微调),结果表明自训练可达到相当的幻觉抑制效果。我们推测这一反直觉现象源于知识蒸馏中暴露偏差加剧,并通过事后分析予以支持。此外,通过引入情境化的“我不知道”响应,提升了对无法回答问题及检索失败的鲁棒性。这些发现表明,仅使用合成数据与自训练即可构建可扩展、低成本的高效问答系统,减少对专有工具或昂贵人工标注的依赖。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in customer support is constrained by hallucination (generating false information) and the high cost of proprietary models. To address these challenges, we propose a retrieval-augmented question-answering (QA) pipeline and explore how to balance human input and automation. Using a dataset of questions about a Samsung Smart TV user manual, we demonstrate that synthetic data generated by LLMs outperforms crowdsourced data in reducing hallucination in finetuned models. We also compare self-training (fine-tuning models on their own outputs) and knowledge distillation (fine-tuning on stronger models' outputs, e.g., GPT-4o), and find that self-training achieves comparable hallucination reduction. We conjecture that this surprising finding can be attributed to increased exposure bias issues in the knowledge distillation case and support this conjecture with post hoc analysis. We also improve robustness to unanswerable questions and retrieval failures with contextualized "I don't know" responses. These findings show that scalable, cost-efficient QA systems can be built using synthetic data and self-training with open-source models, reducing reliance on proprietary tools or costly human annotations.

幻觉抑制自训练合成数据小模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。