arXiv:2502.20789cs.ROcs.AI2025-02被引 9

分析自动驾驶汽车事故前场景,找出关键风险类型与影响因素。

Characteristics Analysis of Autonomous Vehicle Pre-crash Scenarios

  • 基于加州事故报告,用新分类法自动识别24类事故前场景。
  • 发现追尾和交叉路口是两大主因,准确率达98.1%。
  • 揭示交通信号、光照及驾驶习惯等关键影响因素,适合车企与监管参考。

截至目前,自动驾驶汽车在开放道路测试中已发生数百起碰撞事故,凸显提升其可靠性和安全性的迫切需求。事故前场景分类法基于车辆动力学与运动学特征对碰撞进行归类,而特征分析可识别相似场景下的共性特征,更有效反映普遍碰撞模式,并提供针对性的性能优化建议。然而,现有研究多集中于传统人类驾驶车辆的碰撞,缺乏对自动驾驶汽车深入事故分析的系统性研究。本文分析了最新的加州自动驾驶汽车碰撞报告,采用最新修订的事故前场景分类法,提出一套自动提取规则,成功识别出24种事故前场景,准确率达到98.1%。通过详细分析,确定了两类典型事故场景:追尾与交叉路口事故。关联分析显示,追尾事故主要受交通控制方式、地点类型、光照条件等因素显著影响;针对易引发严重碰撞的交叉路口场景,通过因果分析识别出关键成因:惯性违规行为及对特定行为的预期偏差。据此提出优化建议,涵盖政府监管与车企算法改进。研究成果可助力政府部门制定相关法规,指导车企设计测试场景,识别算法在不同真实场景中的潜在缺陷,从而有效优化自动驾驶系统。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

To date, hundreds of crashes have occurred in open road testing of automated vehicles (AVs), highlighting the need for improving AV reliability and safety. Pre-crash scenario typology classifies crashes based on vehicle dynamics and kinematics features. Building on this, characteristics analysis can identify similar features under comparable crashes, offering a more effective reflection of general crash patterns and providing more targeted recommendations for enhancing AV performance. However, current studies primarily concentrated on crashes among conventional human-driven vehicles, leaving a gap in research dedicated to in-depth AV crash analyses. In this paper, we analyzed the latest California AV collision reports and used the newly revised pre-crash scenario typology to identify pre-crash scenarios. We proposed a set of mapping rules for automatically extracting these AV pre-crash scenarios, successfully identifying 24 types with a 98.1% accuracy rate, and obtaining two key scenarios of AV crashes (i.e., rear-end scenarios and intersection scenarios) through detailed analysis. Association analyses of rear-end scenarios showed that the significant environmental influencing factors were traffic control type, location type, light, etc. For intersection scenarios prone to severe crashes with detailed descriptions, we employed causal analyses to obtain the significant causal factors: habitual violations and expectations of certain behavior. Optimization recommendations were then formulated, addressing both governmental oversight and AV manufacturers' potential improvements. The findings of this paper could guide government authorities to develop related regulations, help manufacturers design AV test scenarios, and identify potential shortcomings in control algorithms specific to various real-world scenarios, thereby optimizing AV systems effectively.

自动驾驶事故分析场景分类

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。