对比三种大模型方法，提升虚假信息检测准确率与可解释性。
Unmasking Digital Falsehoods: A Comparative Analysis of LLM-Based Misinformation Detection Strategies
- 融合结构化验证与自适应学习的混合检测策略
- 多领域测试中零样本与微调模型表现差异显著
- 适合关注虚假信息检测、模型可解释性的研究者
社交媒体上虚假信息泛滥引发重大社会关切，亟需可靠的检测机制。大型语言模型如GPT-4和LLaMA2因其先进的自然语言理解与推理能力，被视为潜在的虚假信息检测工具。本文比较了基于文本、多模态及代理式三类大模型方法在虚假信息检测中的表现。评估了微调模型、零样本学习与系统性事实核查机制在公共卫生、政治、金融等不同主题领域的有效性。同时探讨了模型的可扩展性、泛化能力与可解释性，识别出幻觉、对抗攻击及计算资源消耗等关键挑战。研究发现，将结构化验证流程与自适应学习技术结合的混合方法能显著提升检测精度与可解释性。论文最后提出未来方向，包括实时追踪虚假信息、联邦学习与跨平台检测模型。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The proliferation of misinformation on social media has raised significant societal concerns, necessitating robust detection mechanisms. Large Language Models such as GPT-4 and LLaMA2 have been envisioned as possible tools for detecting misinformation based on their advanced natural language understanding and reasoning capabilities. This paper conducts a comparison of LLM-based approaches to detecting misinformation between text-based, multimodal, and agentic approaches. We evaluate the effectiveness of fine-tuned models, zero-shot learning, and systematic fact-checking mechanisms in detecting misinformation across different topic domains like public health, politics, and finance. We also discuss scalability, generalizability, and explainability of the models and recognize key challenges such as hallucination, adversarial attacks on misinformation, and computational resources. Our findings point towards the importance of hybrid approaches that pair structured verification protocols with adaptive learning techniques to enhance detection accuracy and explainability. The paper closes by suggesting potential avenues of future work, including real-time tracking of misinformation, federated learning, and cross-platform detection models.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。