arXiv:2503.01269cs.CLcs.CY2025-03被引 2

AI能模仿政客的潜台词套路,但细节漏洞难辨

ChatGPT for President! Presupposed content in politicians versus GPT-generated texts

  • 用语料库分析对比真实演讲与ChatGPT生成文本的预设策略
  • 模型生成的预设虽多,但用词模式更固定,缺乏创意变化
  • 普通人难察觉差异,警示AI在舆论场中可能被滥用

本研究探讨ChatGPT-4复制政治话语中语言策略的能力,重点关注其生成操纵性语言的潜力。随着大语言模型在文本生成中的普及,对其传播虚假信息和宣传内容的担忧日益增加。研究对比了真实政治演讲与由ChatGPT生成的文本,聚焦预设(presupposition)——一种通过将部分内容视为已知来间接影响受众的修辞手法。采用基于语料库的语用分析方法,评估模型模仿这些说服策略的效果。结果显示,尽管生成文本包含大量操纵性预设,但在频率、形式和功能上仍与政治人物存在关键差异:例如,ChatGPT常依赖固定短语中的状态变化动词,而政治家则以更多样化和创造性的方式使用预设触发词。然而,这些差异难以仅凭肉眼识别,凸显了大语言模型在政治与公共话语中带来的潜在风险。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This study examines ChatGPT-4's capability to replicate linguistic strategies used in political discourse, focusing on its potential for manipulative language generation. As large language models become increasingly popular for text generation, concerns have grown regarding their role in spreading fake news and propaganda. This research compares real political speeches with those generated by ChatGPT, emphasizing presuppositions (a rhetorical device that subtly influences audiences by packaging some content as already known at the moment of utterance, thus swaying opinions without explicit argumentation). Using a corpus-based pragmatic analysis, this study assesses how well ChatGPT can mimic these persuasive strategies. The findings reveal that although ChatGPT-generated texts contain many manipulative presuppositions, key differences emerge in their frequency, form, and function compared with those of politicians. For instance, ChatGPT often relies on change-of-state verbs used in fixed phrases, whereas politicians use presupposition triggers in more varied and creative ways. Such differences, however, are challenging to detect with the naked eye, underscoring the potential risks posed by large language models in political and public discourse.Using a corpus-based pragmatic analysis, this study assesses how well ChatGPT can mimic these persuasive strategies. The findings reveal that although ChatGPT-generated texts contain many manipulative presuppositions, key differences emerge in their frequency, form, and function compared with those of politicians. For instance, ChatGPT often relies on change-of-state verbs used in fixed phrases, whereas politicians use presupposition triggers in more varied and creative ways. Such differences, however, are challenging to detect with the naked eye, underscoring the potential risks posed by large language models in political and public discourse.

语言模型政治话语预设分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。