为语音合成论文评审提供评估指南，避免常见陷阱。
Good practices for evaluation of synthesized speech
- 梳理语音合成评估最佳实践与常见误区。
- 强调需结合作者指南进行综合评审。
- 适合审稿人及语音合成研究者参考。
本文为语音合成领域论文评审提供指导，重点阐述评估环节的最佳实践与常见问题。建议审稿人参考论文集中的作者指南，并将其作为评审依据。本文旨在提供参考意见，审稿人仍应根据具体情况自主判断。该文档将持续更新，以纳入读者反馈。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This document is provided as a guideline for reviewers of papers about speech synthesis. We outline some best practices and common pitfalls for papers about speech synthesis, with a particular focus on evaluation. We also recommend that reviewers check the guidelines for authors written in the paper kit and consider those as reviewing criteria as well. This is intended to be a living document, and it will be updated as we receive comments and feedback from readers. We note that this document is meant to provide guidance only, and that reviewers should ultimately use their own discretion when evaluating papers.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。