arXiv:2503.03888cs.CL2025-03被引 6

用AI识别并移除加州圣克拉拉县2400万份地契中的种族限制条款。

AI for Scaling Legal Reform: Mapping and Redacting Racial Covenants in Santa Clara County

  • 用微调的大模型自动检测地契中的种族限制条款,准确率高。
  • 减少8.65万人工工时,成本不足商业模型的2%。
  • 揭示了种族条款的地理集中和少数开发商的主导作用,适合政策制定者参考。

法律改革因法规、条例和档案数量庞大、结构复杂且相互关联而面临挑战。以消除历史上的种族限制性条款(即禁止特定种族购买房产的地契条款)为例,尽管1948年最高法院裁定此类条款无效,但它们仍广泛存在于美国各地的地契记录中。加州2021年要求各县开展清理工作,但圣克拉拉县(SCC)拥有超过2400万份地契文件,纯人工审查不可行。本文通过与该县书记官办公室合作,提出一种新方法:首先,使用微调的开源大语言模型高效检测种族限制条款,可节省86,500人小时的工作量,成本低于同类闭源模型的2%;其次,展示该模型如何融入负责任的实务流程,包括法律复核与历史档案库建设,并公开发布模型以支持其他数百个类似地区的工作;最后,分析发现种族条款在不同时间段使用频繁,呈现明显的地理集聚特征,且少数开发商承担了主要责任。我们估计到1950年,该县四分之一的房产受此类条款约束。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Legal reform can be challenging in light of the volume, complexity, and interdependence of laws, codes, and records. One salient example of this challenge is the effort to restrict and remove racially restrictive covenants, clauses in property deeds that historically barred individuals of specific races from purchasing homes. Despite the Supreme Court holding such racial covenants unenforceable in 1948, they persist in property records across the United States. Many jurisdictions have moved to identify and strike these provisions, including California, which mandated in 2021 that all counties implement such a process. Yet the scale can be overwhelming, with Santa Clara County (SCC) alone having over 24 million property deed documents, making purely manual review infeasible. We present a novel approach to addressing this pressing issue, developed through a partnership with the SCC Clerk-Recorder's Office. First, we leverage an open large language model, finetuned to detect racial covenants with high precision and recall. We estimate that this system reduces manual efforts by 86,500 person hours and costs less than 2% of the cost for a comparable off-the-shelf closed model. Second, we illustrate the County's integration of this model into responsible operational practice, including legal review and the creation of a historical registry, and release our model to assist the hundreds of jurisdictions engaged in similar efforts. Finally, our results reveal distinct periods of utilization of racial covenants, sharp geographic clustering, and the disproportionate role of a small number of developers in maintaining housing discrimination. We estimate that by 1950, one in four properties across the County were subject to racial covenants.

法律AI种族歧视地契清理大模型应用

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。