arXiv:2503.04767cs.CYcs.AI2025-03综述

对比美欧中三地航空AI监管,提炼安全落地经验。

A cross-regional review of AI safety regulations in the commercial aviation

  • 对比美欧中航空AI政策框架与实施差异
  • 指出严苛监管体系对技术准入的约束作用
  • 适合关注AI合规与行业标准的研究者

本文考察了美国、欧洲联盟和中国在航空领域现有的人工智能政策文件。航空业始终是技术革新的先行者,其严格的安全监管和关键流程为应对人工智能漏洞提供了重要借鉴。由于该行业对安全要求极高,因此成为通过严格法规、标准化流程及新技术认证来防范AI风险的理想平台。研究聚焦于航空领域的人工智能应用、安全规范、标准化建设以及可认证的AI系统发展。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

In this paper we examine the existing artificial intelligence (AI) policy documents in aviation for the following three regions: the United States, European Union, and China. The aviation industry has always been a first mover in adopting technological advancements. This early adoption offers valuable insights because of its stringent regulations and safety-critical procedures. As a result, the aviation industry provides an optimal platform to counter AI vulnerabilities through its tight regulations, standardization processes, and certification of new technologies. Keywords: AI in aviation; aviation safety; standardization; certifiable AI; regulations

AI安全航空监管标准化政策比较

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。