arXiv:2503.05493cs.IRcs.CL2025-03NeurIPS被引 5

对比大模型与传统推荐系统,发现大模型更准但慢,不适合实时场景。

Can LLMs Outshine Conventional Recommenders? A Comparative Evaluation

  • 用多种物品表示法测试大模型和传统推荐器
  • 大模型在点击率预测上提升5% AUC,序列推荐提升170% NDCG@10
  • 适合研究推荐专用加速方法,不适用于实时推荐

近年来,将大语言模型(LLMs)融入推荐系统为提升推荐质量带来了新机遇。然而,亟需全面基准来评估并比较 LLM 与传统推荐系统的能力。本文提出 RecBench,系统研究了多种物品表示形式(包括唯一标识符、文本、语义嵌入和语义标识符),并评估两类主要推荐任务:点击率预测(CTR)和序列推荐(SeqRec)。大规模实验涵盖最多17个大型模型,在时尚、新闻、视频、书籍和音乐五个不同数据集上进行。结果表明,基于 LLM 的推荐器优于传统推荐器,在 CTR 场景下最高提升5% AUC,SeqRec 场景下最高提升170% NDCG@10。然而,这些显著性能提升以大幅降低推理效率为代价,使 LLM-as-RS 模式在实时推荐环境中不可行。我们希望研究成果能激励未来研究,包括针对推荐任务的模型加速方法。我们将公开代码、数据、配置及平台,支持其他研究者复现与拓展。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

In recent years, integrating large language models (LLMs) into recommender systems has created new opportunities for improving recommendation quality. However, a comprehensive benchmark is needed to thoroughly evaluate and compare the recommendation capabilities of LLMs with traditional recommender systems. In this paper, we introduce RecBench, which systematically investigates various item representation forms (including unique identifier, text, semantic embedding, and semantic identifier) and evaluates two primary recommendation tasks, i.e., click-through rate prediction (CTR) and sequential recommendation (SeqRec). Our extensive experiments cover up to 17 large models and are conducted across five diverse datasets from fashion, news, video, books, and music domains. Our findings indicate that LLM-based recommenders outperform conventional recommenders, achieving up to a 5% AUC improvement in the CTR scenario and up to a 170% NDCG@10 improvement in the SeqRec scenario. However, these substantial performance gains come at the expense of significantly reduced inference efficiency, rendering the LLM-as-RS paradigm impractical for real-time recommendation environments. We aim for our findings to inspire future research, including recommendation-specific model acceleration methods. We will release our code, data, configurations, and platform to enable other researchers to reproduce and build upon our experimental results.

大模型推荐性能对比推理效率推荐系统

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。