分析取消文化背后的道德分歧，构建标注数据集揭示评价差异根源
That is Unacceptable: the Moral Foundations of Canceling
- 构建了包含取消事件的标注数据集CADE，研究道德观如何影响判断
- 发现不同事件类型和名人角色显著影响判断结果，道德是独立解释维度
- 为开发更精准的社交平台内容检测技术提供数据支持，适合社会计算研究者
取消文化是一种由道德驱动的现象，阻碍了安全社交平台的发展并加剧意识形态分裂。为解决此问题，我们提出了取消态度检测（CADE）数据集，一个用于探索社交媒体上对取消行为评价分歧因素的标注语料库。具体而言，研究了标注者道德观对其取消态度感知的影响，表明道德是解释该现象分歧的独立维度。标注者的判断高度依赖于争议事件类型及涉及的公众人物。这凸显了需构建更多以事件为中心的数据集，以更好理解社交媒体中的伤害机制，并开发更具意识的技术进行检测。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Canceling is a morally-driven phenomenon that hinders the development of safe social media platforms and contributes to ideological polarization. To address this issue we present the Canceling Attitudes Detection (CADE) dataset, an annotated corpus of canceling incidents aimed at exploring the factors of disagreements in evaluating people canceling attitudes on social media. Specifically, we study the impact of annotators' morality in their perception of canceling, showing that morality is an independent axis for the explanation of disagreement on this phenomenon. Annotator's judgments heavily depend on the type of controversial events and involved celebrities. This shows the need to develop more event-centric datasets to better understand how harms are perpetrated in social media and to develop more aware technologies for their detection.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。