从新闻与高校的AI政策看全球立法如何补短板
Local Differences, Global Lessons: Insights from Organisation Policies for International Legislation
- 对比新闻与高校的AI政策,找共性与差异
- 发现组织级政策覆盖素养、披露、环保等监管盲区
- 建议将本地经验融入国际AI法规,如欧盟法案
AI在各领域的快速应用催生了差异显著的组织级指南,即使在同一行业亦然。本文分析新闻机构与高校的AI政策,探究自下而上的治理模式如何影响AI使用与监督。研究发现,这些政策在应对偏见、隐私、虚假信息和问责等风险上存在共识与分歧。进一步探讨其对国际AI立法(特别是欧盟AI法案)的启示,指出当前框架在AI素养、披露实践及环境影响等领域的不足。研究表明,组织层面的经验可为全球更灵活、有效的AI治理提供实用参考,并提出具体建议以弥合地方实践与国际法规之间的鸿沟。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The rapid adoption of AI across diverse domains has led to the development of organisational guidelines that vary significantly, even within the same sector. This paper examines AI policies in two domains, news organisations and universities, to understand how bottom-up governance approaches shape AI usage and oversight. By analysing these policies, we identify key areas of convergence and divergence in how organisations address risks such as bias, privacy, misinformation, and accountability. We then explore the implications of these findings for international AI legislation, particularly the EU AI Act, highlighting gaps where practical policy insights could inform regulatory refinements. Our analysis reveals that organisational policies often address issues such as AI literacy, disclosure practices, and environmental impact, areas that are underdeveloped in existing international frameworks. We argue that lessons from domain-specific AI policies can contribute to more adaptive and effective AI governance at the global level. This study provides actionable recommendations for policymakers seeking to bridge the gap between local AI practices and international regulations.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。