arXiv:2503.05781cs.CYcs.CL2025-03

剖析AI诗歌与艺术的融合困境,揭示技术叙事背后的隐喻陷阱

Where is my Glass Slipper? AI, Poetry and Art

  • 从早期模板到生成模型,梳理计算机写诗的技术演进
  • 批判性评估图灵测试等框架在衡量诗意创造力时的局限性
  • 自反性写作挑战作者身份,推动人机共创的哲学反思

本文综述人工智能、诗歌与艺术的交叉领域,系统考察数字创作实践的历史演进与当前争议。从早期基于模板的系统到生成式模型,分析其发展脉络;批判性评述适配图灵测试、FACE模型与ProFTAP等评价体系,探讨其对创意性、语义连贯性与文化相关性的测量效度,凸显复制人类诗意细腻表达的持续难题。文章引入营销理论视角,解构科技公司使用的去人性化语言与拟人化隐喻,揭示其简化叙事的本质,并凸显算法精准性与真实创造力之间的张力。此外,通过自传式民族志方法,反思本文自身创作过程中的AI介入,动摇传统作者身份与客观性概念,呼应解构主义,挑战学术话语中的逻各斯中心主义。最终呼吁重新审视创造过程,承认技术创新与人类主体性的相互依存关系,倡导跨学科对话,应对伦理、文化与哲学议题,重新定义艺术生产的边界。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This literature review interrogates the intersections between artificial intelligence, poetry, and art, offering a comprehensive exploration of both historical evolution and current debates in digital creative practices. It traces the development of computer-generated poetry from early template-based systems to generative models, critically assessing evaluative frameworks such as adaptations of the Turing Test, the FACE model, and ProFTAP. It also examines how these frameworks endeavour to measure creativity, semantic coherence, and cultural relevance in AI-generated texts, whilst highlighting the persistent challenges in replicating the nuance of human poetic expression. The review contributes a Marketing Theory discussion that deconstructs the figurative marketing narratives employed by AI companies, which utilise sanitised language and anthropomorphic metaphors to humanise their technologies. This discussion reveals the reductive nature of such narratives and underscores the tension between algorithmic precision and the realities of human creativity.The review also incorporates an auto-ethnographic account that offers a self-reflexive commentary on its own composition. By acknowledging the use of AI in crafting this review, the auto-ethnographic account destabilises conventional notions of authorship and objectivity, resonating with deconstruction and challenging logocentric assumptions in academic discourse. Ultimately, the review calls for a re-evaluation of creative processes that recognises the interdependence of technological innovation and human subjectivity. It advocates for interdisciplinary dialogue addressing ethical, cultural, and philosophical concerns, while reimagining the boundaries of artistic production.

AI艺术诗歌生成人文反思

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。