AI无法自我怀疑，故无道德主体性，值得深思。
Dubito Ergo Sum: Exploring AI Ethics
- 以怀疑能力为道德主体核心，指出AI缺此特质
- 人类道德依赖直觉与自省，非理性推导
- 探讨人性与AI根本差异，启发伦理思考
我们重新诠释笛卡尔名言‘我思故我在’，提出在人工智能伦理中，‘我怀疑故我在’是道德性的必要条件。因此，因无法自我怀疑，AI不具备道德主体性。本文深入探讨人类心智与AI的根本差异，包括感知基础、理解行为以及自我质疑的意义。我们的论点基于历史悠久的伦理学体系，但人类对自身道德的认知仍处于初级阶段。历经数千年研究，现代道德心理学认为人类的道德决策源于直觉，仅在自我解释时，伦理模型才具意义。这一认知深刻影响了我们对人工智能伦理的理解。本文不提供解决方案，而是探索若干思路，使问题比之前更清晰。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We paraphrase Descartes' famous dictum in the area of AI ethics where the "I doubt and therefore I am" is suggested as a necessary aspect of morality. Therefore AI, which cannot doubt itself, cannot possess moral agency. Of course, this is not the end of the story. We explore various aspects of the human mind that substantially differ from AI, which includes the sensory grounding of our knowing, the act of understanding, and the significance of being able to doubt ourselves. The foundation of our argument is the discipline of ethics, one of the oldest and largest knowledge projects of human history, yet, we seem only to be beginning to get a grasp of it. After a couple of thousand years of studying the ethics of humans, we (humans) arrived at a point where moral psychology suggests that our moral decisions are intuitive, and all the models from ethics become relevant only when we explain ourselves. This recognition has a major impact on what and how we can do regarding AI ethics. We do not offer a solution, we explore some ideas and leave the problem open, but we hope somewhat better understood than before our study.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。