对比不同语法标注体系对依存句法解析的影响，发现标准标注不总更优。
A Systematic Comparison of Syntactic Representations of Dependency Parsing
- 将通用依存树库中的特定句法结构转为标准表示
- 跨语言评估显示解析性能差异显著
- 适合关注句法标注影响的自然语言处理研究者
我们比较了基于转换的句法解析器在不同标注方案下的表现。提出将通用依存树库中观察到的某些特定句法构造转换为所谓的更标准表示，并在该项目涵盖的所有语言上评估解析性能。结果表明，'标准'构造并未系统性提升解析效果，且得分随语言不同波动明显。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We compare the performance of a transition-based parser in regards to different annotation schemes. We pro-pose to convert some specific syntactic constructions observed in the universal dependency treebanks into a so-called more standard representation and to evaluate parsing performances over all the languages of the project. We show that the ``standard'' constructions do not lead systematically to better parsing performance and that the scores vary considerably according to the languages.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。