打破生成模型的伪二分法，强调推理阶段设计优先。

Generative pre-training is often framed through a false dichotomy between autoregressive models for discrete signals and diffusion models for continuous signals. We argue that the dichotomy is false because it conflates model family, data representation, training objective, and inference procedure. Autoregression is an inference procedure that expands a sequence through normalized conditional draws, while diffusion is a refinement procedure that repeatedly revises an existing state. The more useful contrast is therefore not autoregressive versus diffusion, but discrete tokens learned with cross-entropy versus continuous tokens learned with diffusion-style objectives, together with the inference algorithms used to sample from them. From this perspective, algorithmic progress should prioritize inference-time efficiency along two axes: sequence expansion and state refinement. We advocate designing the inference procedure before the training objective, because a training method cannot compensate for an inference map that omits necessary arguments or imposes an incorrect factorization. We illustrate this principle through a target-time limitation of DDIM-style samplers, a joint-distribution limitation of multi-token prediction, and recent flow-map and few-step distillation methods that directly parameterize long-range inference moves.