用AI框架指导二语写作，提升思辨能力
Developing Critical Thinking in Second Language Learners: Exploring Generative AI like ChatGPT as a Tool for Argumentative Essay Writing
- 设计CGCAW框架，结合思维模型与ChatGPT引导写作
- 实验组在逻辑连贯性和论据使用上显著优于对照组
- 适合语言教师探索AI辅助思辨教学，需优化框架细节
本研究基于保罗-艾尔德思辨模型与谭的论证写作框架，构建了ChatGPT引导思辨写作（CGCAW）方法。10名公立大学学生分为实验组（使用CGCAW）和对照组（仅用ChatGPT），在40分钟内完成议论文写作。三名评估者（ChatGPT、Grammarly、授课教师）评分显示，实验组在清晰度、逻辑连贯性和证据使用方面表现更优，但对照组在整体语言规范性和核心论点表达上更佳。结果表明，该框架可有效促进二语学习者的思辨写作，但仍有优化空间。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This study employs the Paul-Elder Critical Thinking Model and Tan's argumentative writing framework to create a structured methodology. This methodology, ChatGPT Guideline for Critical Argumentative Writing (CGCAW) framework, integrates the models with ChatGPT's capabilities to guide L2 learners in utilizing ChatGPT to enhance their critical thinking skills. A quantitative experiment was conducted with 10 participants from a state university, divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group utilized the CGCAW framework, while the control group used ChatGPT without specific guidelines. Participants wrote an argumentative essay within a 40-minute timeframe, and essays were evaluated by three assessors: ChatGPT, Grammarly, and a course instructor. Results indicated that the experimental group showed improvements in clarity, logical coherence, and use of evidence, demonstrating ChatGPT's potential to enhance specific aspects of argumentative writing. However, the control group performed better in overall language mechanics and articulation of main arguments, indicating areas where the CGCAW framework could be further refined. This study highlights the need for further research to optimize the use of AI tools like ChatGPT in L2 learning environments to enhance critical thinking and writing skills.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。