让大模型自己用自然语言批改推理步骤,提升复杂问题求解能力
Dancing with Critiques: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Stepwise Natural Language Self-Critique
- 每步推理后生成人类可读的自我批评文本作为反馈
- 在AIME和GPQA上超越传统奖励评分方法,显著提升准确率
- 无需额外训练验证器,适用于多种复杂推理任务
提升大语言模型在需要多步逻辑推演的复杂任务中的推理能力仍是重大挑战。传统推理时扩展方法使用过程奖励模型提供的标量奖励信号评估候选推理步骤,但这些标量奖励缺乏理解与解释每一步所需的细微定性信息。本文提出一种新型推理时扩展方法——分步自然语言自批判(PANEL),通过自动生成自然语言批判作为反馈,指导步骤级搜索过程。通过为每个候选推理步骤生成丰富的人类可读批判,PANEL保留了关键的定性信息,有助于推理期间做出更明智的决策。该方法无需任务特定的验证器及其相关训练开销,因此在多种任务中具有广泛适用性。在AIME和GPQA等挑战性推理基准上的实验结果表明,PANEL显著提升了推理性能,优于传统的标量奖励基方法。代码已公开于https://github.com/puddingyeah/PANEL,以支持并鼓励该有前景领域的后续研究。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), particularly for complex tasks requiring multi-step logical deductions, remains a significant challenge. Traditional inference time scaling methods utilize scalar reward signals from process reward models to evaluate candidate reasoning steps, but these scalar rewards lack the nuanced qualitative information essential for understanding and justifying each step. In this paper, we propose a novel inference-time scaling approach -- stepwise natural language self-critique (PANEL), which employs self-generated natural language critiques as feedback to guide the step-level search process. By generating rich, human-readable critiques for each candidate reasoning step, PANEL retains essential qualitative information, facilitating better-informed decision-making during inference. This approach bypasses the need for task-specific verifiers and the associated training overhead, making it broadly applicable across diverse tasks. Experimental results on challenging reasoning benchmarks, including AIME and GPQA, demonstrate that PANEL significantly enhances reasoning performance, outperforming traditional scalar reward-based methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/puddingyeah/PANEL to support and encourage future research in this promising field.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。