arXiv:2503.18395cs.IRcs.AI2025-03被引 2

统一建模搜索相关性与点击率预测,提升推荐一致性与个性化

PRECTR: A Synergistic Framework for Integrating Personalized Search Relevance Matching and CTR Prediction

  • 通过条件概率融合机制整合两大任务,增强模块间协同
  • 两阶段训练+语义一致性正则化,解决收敛难与无关推荐问题
  • 基于用户历史偏好动态调整激励,适配不同用户的搜索习惯

搜索推荐系统中的核心任务是搜索相关性匹配与点击率(CTR)预测——前者关注为用户查询找到相关结果,后者预测哪些项目更符合用户兴趣。以往研究通常分别构建两个模型独立预测CTR和相关性,再融合输出排序,但这种分离式方法导致模型间不一致。同时,相关性模型侧重客观文本匹配,忽视用户间的个性化差异,限制了性能提升。为此,我们提出统一的个性化搜索相关性匹配与CTR预测融合模型(PRECTR)。基于条件概率融合机制,将两项任务整合到一个框架中以增强模块间交互与一致性。然而,直接优化二分类的CTR损失可能导致模型收敛困难,并无限放大高CTR但低相关性的项目曝光。因此,我们引入两阶段训练和语义一致性正则化,加速收敛并抑制无关推荐。最后,考虑到用户间相关性偏好差异,通过分析相似查询的历史用户偏好,动态调整候选项目的激励权重,实现个性化适配。在生产数据集及线上A/B测试中,实验结果验证了PRECTR的有效性与优越性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The two primary tasks in the search recommendation system are search relevance matching and click-through rate (CTR) prediction -- the former focuses on seeking relevant items for user queries whereas the latter forecasts which item may better match user interest. Prior research typically develops two models to predict the CTR and search relevance separately, then ranking candidate items based on the fusion of the two outputs. However, such a divide-and-conquer paradigm creates the inconsistency between different models. Meanwhile, the search relevance model mainly concentrates on the degree of objective text matching while neglecting personalized differences among different users, leading to restricted model performance. To tackle these issues, we propose a unified Personalized Search RElevance Matching and CTR Prediction Fusion Model(PRECTR). Specifically, based on the conditional probability fusion mechanism, PRECTR integrates the CTR prediction and search relevance matching into one framework to enhance the interaction and consistency of the two modules. However, directly optimizing CTR binary classification loss may bring challenges to the fusion model's convergence and indefinitely promote the exposure of items with high CTR, regardless of their search relevance. Hence, we further introduce two-stage training and semantic consistency regularization to accelerate the model's convergence and restrain the recommendation of irrelevant items. Finally, acknowledging that different users may have varied relevance preferences, we assessed current users' relevance preferences by analyzing past users' preferences for similar queries and tailored incentives for different candidate items accordingly. Extensive experimental results on our production dataset and online A/B testing demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed PRECTR method.

搜索推荐多任务学习个性化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。