arXiv:2503.18983cs.CYcs.AI2025-03被引 8

AI可能威胁人类存续,国际法有义务要求各国提前监管。

Confronting Catastrophic Risk: The International Obligation to Regulate Artificial Intelligence

  • 基于预防原则,主张国际法要求各国主动监管高风险AI。
  • 若未采取行动,延迟应对可能导致不可逆的人类灭绝后果。
  • 适合关注AI治理、国际法与全球安全的读者。

尽管人工智能(AI)潜力巨大,但许多领域专家警告其发展存在非微不足道的人类灭绝风险。现有监管仅聚焦消费者安全、网络安全、数据保护等具体风险,未回应这一潜在终极威胁。在缺乏针对AI导致人类灭绝风险的监管行动时,问题在于:国际法是否对国家施加了监管AI发展的法律义务?本文基于预防原则论证,存在一项国际法义务,要求各国减轻由AI引发的人类灭绝威胁。该原则常用于环境与高危技术监管,强调在重大危害可能发生、科学尚未完全确定时,不应推迟预防措施,以免延误造成不可逆后果。我们主张,预防原则是国际法的一般原则,因此根据国际人权法中生命权的规定,各国负有积极义务,须主动采取监管措施以降低AI的潜在生存性风险。若此国际义务得以确立,将为应对这一演变中的全球性威胁奠定基本法律框架。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

While artificial intelligence (AI) holds enormous promise, many experts in the field are warning that there is a non-trivial chance that the development of AI poses an existential threat to humanity. Existing regulatory initiative do not address this threat but merely instead focus on discrete AI-related risks such as consumer safety, cybersecurity, data protection, and privacy. In the absence of regulatory action to address the possible risk of human extinction by AI, the question arises: What legal obligations, if any, does public international law impose on states to regulate its development. Grounded in the precautionary principle, we argue that there exists an international obligation to mitigate the threat of human extinction by AI. Often invoked in relation to environmental regulation and the regulation of potentially harmful technologies, the principle holds that in situations where there is the potential for significant harm, even in the absence of full scientific certainty, preventive measures should not be postponed if delayed action may result in irreversible consequences. We argue that the precautionary principle is a general principle of international law and, therefore, that there is a positive obligation on states under the right to life within international human rights law to proactively take regulatory action to mitigate the potential existential risk of AI. This is significant because, if an international obligation to regulate the development of AI can be established under international law, then the basic legal framework would be in place to address this evolving threat.

AI治理国际法风险监管

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。