arXiv:2504.00035cs.CRcs.AI2025-04

用隐式水印保护创意写作版权,防止AI模仿

Protecting Creative Writing Copyright against AI Imitation via Implicit Watermarking

  • 将创作精髓分解为五个维度,提取凝练特征
  • 98%以上准确率,误报率低,不修改原文
  • 适合版权方、出版机构、创作者使用

大型语言模型(LLMs)通过上下文学习和微调实现强大知识注入,但也带来高价值创意作品被未经授权模仿的风险。现有版权保护技术多集中于视觉媒体,创意写作的保护仍属空白。本文研究新挑战:验证AI生成文本是否未经许可继承了受保护作品的创作本质。提出WIND(Watermarking via Implicit and Non-disruptive Disentanglement)零水印框架,构建可验证的隐式创作签名。WIND将创作本质分解为五个互补维度,利用基于LLM的实例界定机制提取受保护创作特征的紧凑表示。通过解耦创作相关信息与无关文本变化,将这些表示映射到紧凑水印空间,不修改原始文本。大量实验表明,WIND在多种AI模仿场景下实现超过98%的F1分数,显著优于现有水印与文本分类方法,同时保持低误报率。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language models (LLMs) enable powerful knowledge injection through approaches such as in-context learning and fine-tuning, but they also introduce new risks of unauthorized imitation of high-value creative works. Existing copyright protection techniques mainly focus on visual media, leaving the protection of creative writing largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate a new challenge: verifying whether AI-generated texts inherit the creative essence of protected works without authorization. We propose WIND (Watermarking via Implicit and Non-disruptive Disentanglement), a zero-watermarking framework that constructs an implicit and verifiable creative signature for copyright verification. WIND decomposes creative essence into five complementary dimensions and leverages an LLM-based instance delimitation mechanism to extract condensed representations of protected creative characteristics. By disentangling creative-specific information from irrelevant textual variations, these representations are mapped into a compact watermark space without modifying the original texts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that WIND achieves over 98\% F1 scores while maintaining low false-positive rates, substantially outperforming existing watermarking and text classification approaches under various AI imitation scenarios.

版权保护隐式水印AI模仿防御

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。