GenAI不能因生成内容就豁免版权责任，与人类应同等待遇。
Unfair Learning: GenAI Exceptionalism and Copyright Law
- 对比人类创作，指出GenAI的合理使用主张对人类同样适用
- 强调若允许GenAI例外，则人类也应全免版权费用
- 主张回归版权本质：是否促进科学与艺术发展
本文质疑生成式人工智能（GenAI）基于合理使用辩护而享有广泛版权免责权的正当性。通过分析合理使用法律论据及八项具体主张，论文指出：所有支持GenAI合理使用的法律与实质理由，对人类同样成立，甚至更适用。因此，赋予GenAI在此领域的特殊豁免，既违背法律逻辑，也与禁止个人大规模复制受版权保护作品的立场矛盾。若承认此类例外，意味着人类将无需为任何版权作品付费。解决方案是审慎看待任何实体的大规模版权复制行为，回归版权制度初衷——判断这种例外主义是否真正促进科学与艺术的发展。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This paper challenges the argument that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is entitled to broad immunity from copyright law for reproducing copyrighted works without authorization due to a fair use defense. It examines fair use legal arguments and eight distinct substantive arguments, contending that every legal and substantive argument favoring fair use for GenAI applies equally, if not more so, to humans. Therefore, granting GenAI exceptional privileges in this domain is legally and logically inconsistent with withholding broad fair use exemptions from individual humans. It would mean no human would need to pay for virtually any copyright work again. The solution is to take a circumspect view of any fair use claim for mass copyright reproduction by any entity and focus on the first principles of whether permitting such exceptionalism for GenAI promotes science and the arts.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。