分析202起真实AI伦理事件，揭示责任归属与治理短板
Who is Responsible When AI Fails? Mapping Causes, Entities, and Consequences of AI Privacy and Ethical Incidents
- 基于202起真实案例构建全生命周期分类体系
- 超半数事件源于组织决策失误与法律合规缺失
- 适合政策制定者与企业合规团队参考
人工智能技术的快速发展引发重大隐私与伦理问题。现有AI事件分类体系和指南缺乏真实案例支撑，难以有效预防与应对。本文分析了202起真实的AI隐私与伦理事件，构建了一个覆盖AI全生命周期的分类体系，涵盖事件成因、责任主体、披露来源及影响后果。研究发现，多数伤害源于组织决策不当与法律不合规，纠错措施有限，且开发者与采用方极少主动报告。该分类体系为系统化事件上报提供结构化框架，凸显当前AI治理机制的薄弱环节。研究结果可为政策制定者与实践者提供行动指引，强化用户保护，推动针对性政策制定，改进报告机制，促进负责任的AI治理与创新，尤其在社交媒体与儿童保护等场景中具有重要价值。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has raised major privacy and ethical concerns. However, existing AI incident taxonomies and guidelines lack grounding in real-world cases, limiting their effectiveness for prevention and mitigation. We analyzed 202 real-world AI privacy and ethical incidents to develop a taxonomy that classifies them across AI lifecycle stages and captures contributing factors, including causes, responsible entities, sources of disclosure, and impacts. Our findings reveal widespread harms from poor organizational decisions and legal non-compliance, limited corrective interventions, and rare reporting from AI developers and adopting entities. Our taxonomy offers a structured approach for systematic incident reporting and emphasizes the weaknesses of current AI governance frameworks. Our findings provide actionable guidance for policymakers and practitioners to strengthen user protections, develop targeted AI policies, enhance reporting practices, and foster responsible AI governance and innovation, especially in contexts such as social media and child protection.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。