对比美国公众与AI领袖对AI的恐惧与期待，发现观点差异显著。
The Hall of AI Fears and Hopes: Comparing the Views of AI Influencers and those of Members of the U.S. Public Through an Interactive Platform
- 搭建互动平台收集330名代表性公众的AI看法
- 100位《时代》杂志认定的AI领袖更关注监管而非失控风险
- 女性和少数族裔领袖的观点与公众中同类群体差异明显
AI发展由学术界和产业领袖（称作“影响力人物”）推动，但其观点是否与公众一致尚不明确。为此，我们开发了一个互动平台，用于收集公众对AI的恐惧、希望及整体乐观程度。平台向330名在年龄、性别、族裔和政治倾向上代表美国人口的参与者开放，并与《时代》杂志评选出的100位AI影响力人物的观点进行比较。结果显示，公众普遍担忧AI失控，而影响力人物则更强调监管，似乎意在转移对其商业化倾向的关注。有趣的是，来自少数族裔和女性的影响力人物观点，往往与公众中同类别群体存在差异。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
AI development is shaped by academics and industry leaders - let us call them ``influencers'' - but it is unclear how their views align with those of the public. To address this gap, we developed an interactive platform that served as a data collection tool for exploring public views on AI, including their fears, hopes, and overall sense of hopefulness. We made the platform available to 330 participants representative of the U.S. population in terms of age, sex, ethnicity, and political leaning, and compared their views with those of 100 AI influencers identified by Time magazine. The public fears AI getting out of control, while influencers emphasize regulation, seemingly to deflect attention from their alleged focus on monetizing AI's potential. Interestingly, the views of AI influencers from underrepresented groups such as women and people of color often differ from the views of underrepresented groups in the public.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。