探究大模型中文本对时序预测的作用与可解释性
Exploring the Effectiveness and Interpretability of Texts in LLM-based Time Series Models
- 通过实证实验分析文本提示与原型的效果
- 发现文本与时序数据存在模态错位,提升有限
- 提出新指标SMI评估文本与时序匹配度,适合研究可解释性
大语言模型(LLMs)被用于时序预测任务,借助预训练语言模型作为主干,并引入文本数据以增强模型对时序的综合理解能力。然而,这些文本是否真能提升模型性能并具备可解释性?本研究通过一系列实证实验,考察了文本提示与文本原型的作用。结果表明,多模态间存在显著错位,文本信息在多数情况下未能显著提升时序预测性能。可视化分析进一步显示,现有框架学习到的文本表征在应用于时序数据时缺乏足够可解释性。为此,我们提出一种新指标——语义匹配指数(Semantic Matching Index, SMI),用于后验可解释性分析。研究揭示了当前时序语言模型中文本的不匹配与可解释性局限,旨在提升对该问题的关注。代码已开源:https://github.com/zachysun/TS-Lang-Exp。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to time series forecasting tasks, leveraging pre-trained language models as the backbone and incorporating textual data to purportedly enhance the comprehensive capabilities of LLMs for time series. However, are these texts really helpful for interpretation? This study seeks to investigate the actual efficacy and interpretability of such textual incorporations. Through a series of empirical experiments on textual prompts and textual prototypes, our findings reveal that the misalignment between two modalities exists, and the textual information does not significantly improve time series forecasting performance in many cases. Furthermore, visualization analysis indicates that the textual representations learned by existing frameworks lack sufficient interpretability when applied to time series data. We further propose a novel metric named Semantic Matching Index (SMI) to better evaluate the matching degree between time series and texts during our post hoc interpretability investigation. Our analysis reveals the misalignment and limited interpretability of texts in current time-series LLMs, and we hope this study can raise awareness of the interpretability of texts for time series. The code is available at https://github.com/zachysun/TS-Lang-Exp.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。