提醒学生警惕生成式AI依赖，强调自主思考能力的重要性
Generative AI in Collaborative Academic Report Writing: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Ethical Considerations
- 主张学生应通过独立思考培养终身学习能力
- 指出生成式AI存在幻觉、偏见和信息误导风险
- 适合关注AI伦理与教育应用的师生阅读
生成式AI工具在任务自动化方面的普及引发了教育领域的担忧，部分学生可能过度依赖这些工具完成本应促进学习的作业。本文强调学生应在求学期间投入时间发展自主批判性思维能力，而非依赖易产生错误信息、幻觉和偏见的AI模型。随着社会步入以AI为中心的时代，有必要向学生普及这些模型的工作原理、潜在缺陷及数据输入所涉及的伦理问题。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The availability and abundance of GenAI tools to administer tasks traditionally managed by people have raised concerns, particularly within the education and academic sectors, as some students may highly rely on these tools to complete the assignments designed to enable learning. This article focuses on informing students about the significance of investing their time during their studies on developing essential life-long learning skills using their own critical thinking, rather than depending on AI models that are susceptible to misinformation, hallucination, and bias. As we transition to an AI-centric era, it is important to educate students on how these models work, their pitfalls, and the ethical concerns associated with feeding data to such tools.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。