提出混合智能框架,破解教育AI中的九大顽疾。
Towards responsible AI for education: Hybrid human-AI to confront the Elephant in the room
- 用神经符号方法融合符号逻辑与深度学习,提升模型可解释性。
- 指出现有AI忽视动机、情绪等核心学习过程,导致评估失真。
- 适合关注教育公平与可信AI的学者、开发者及政策制定者。
尽管教育领域的人工智能系统取得显著进展,且学界持续呼吁负责任的AI教育应用,但仍有九个关键问题长期未解,成为该领域的‘大象’——即被忽视却至关重要的难题。这些问题包括:(1) 教育AI概念模糊,常被等同于通用大语言模型;(2) 忽视动机、情绪与元认知等核心学习过程及其情境性;(3) 领域知识整合不足,利益相关方参与缺失;(4) 在时间序列教育数据上仍使用非序列机器学习模型;(5) 用非序列指标评估序列模型;(6) 使用不可靠的可解释性方法解释黑箱模型;(7) 忽视伦理规范处理训练数据不一致;(8) 缺乏系统性基准测试即盲目使用主流方法进行模式发现;(9) 过度强调普适建议而忽略个性化推荐。基于理论与实证研究,本文证明神经符号人工智能(neural-symbolic AI)能有效应对上述挑战,为构建负责任、可信的教育AI系统奠定基础。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Despite significant advancements in AI-driven educational systems and ongoing calls for responsible AI for education, several critical issues remain unresolved -- acting as the elephant in the room within AI in education, learning analytics, educational data mining, learning sciences, and educational psychology communities. This critical analysis identifies and examines nine persistent challenges that continue to undermine the fairness, transparency, and effectiveness of current AI methods and applications in education. These include: (1) the lack of clarity around what AI for education truly means -- often ignoring the distinct purposes, strengths, and limitations of different AI families -- and the trend of equating it with domain-agnostic, company-driven large language models; (2) the widespread neglect of essential learning processes such as motivation, emotion, and (meta)cognition in AI-driven learner modelling and their contextual nature; (3) limited integration of domain knowledge and lack of stakeholder involvement in AI design and development; (4) continued use of non-sequential machine learning models on temporal educational data; (5) misuse of non-sequential metrics to evaluate sequential models; (6) use of unreliable explainable AI methods to provide explanations for black-box models; (7) ignoring ethical guidelines in addressing data inconsistencies during model training; (8) use of mainstream AI methods for pattern discovery and learning analytics without systematic benchmarking; and (9) overemphasis on global prescriptions while overlooking localised, student-specific recommendations. Supported by theoretical and empirical research, we demonstrate how hybrid AI methods -- specifically neural-symbolic AI -- can address the elephant in the room and serve as the foundation for responsible, trustworthy AI systems in education.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。